Court questions relevance of 1986 labeling case to rodenticide dispute

J.R. Pegg

首页> 外文期刊>Pesticide(s) & Toxic Chemical News >Court questions relevance of 1986 labeling case to rodenticide dispute

【24h】

Court questions relevance of 1986 labeling case to rodenticide dispute

机译：法院质疑1986年标签案与杀鼠剂争议的相关性

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The dispute between EPA and Reckitt-Benckiser took center stage at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals last week, as a three-judge panel considered the company's complaint that EPA has effectively cancelled its rodenticide products by threatening to bring misbranding actions against it. The panel pressed both sides on the question of whether EPA's threat is a final and binding action, and their queries suggested that a similar 1986 case could provide a precedent favorable to Reckitt-Benckiser.

机译：EPA与Reckitt-Benckiser之间的纠纷上周在DC巡回上诉法院占据了中心位置，由三名法官组成的陪审团认为该公司的投诉是EPA威胁要对它进行假冒商标，从而有效地取消了其杀鼠剂产品。专家小组就双方的威胁是否是EPA的最终约束性行动向双方提出了质疑，他们的询问表明，与1986年类似的案件可能为Reckitt-Benckiser提供有利的先例。

著录项

来源
《Pesticide(s) & Toxic Chemical News》 |2010年第26期|共2页
作者
J.R. Pegg;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类农药防治（化学防治）;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Court questions relevance of 1986 labeling case to rodenticide dispute [J] . J.R. Pegg Pesticide(s) & Toxic Chemical News . 2010,第26期

机译：法院质疑1986年标签案与杀鼠剂争议的相关性
2. In Entergy system-cost dispute, FERC ruling upheld in court, but refund question still open [J] . Electric Utility Week . 2008,第04a21期

机译：在Entergy系统成本纠纷中，FERC的裁决在法院维持不变，但退款问题仍未解决
3. Court Rejects Challenge to FCC's 'DE' Requirements; Challengers Say Merits of Dispute Remain in Question [J] . Paul Kirby Telecommunications Reports . 2007,第20期

机译：法院拒绝对FCC的“ DE”要求提出质疑；挑战者称争议仍存争议
4. Urgency Of The Supreme Court Regulation No. 5 Year 2016 About Certification Of Sharia Economic Judges In The Settlement Of Sharia Economic Disputes In Religious Court [C] . Shofiyun Nahidloh International Conference on Social Sciences . 2019

机译：2016年最高法院监管的紧迫感关于伊斯兰教法院解决伊斯兰教赛经济争端的伊斯兰教审法定的第5届
5. The WTO appellate body's autonomy to transform the WTO dispute settlement system: Insights from theory and a comparative analysis of the International Court of Justice and the U.S. Supreme Court. [D] . Alvarez, Alberto. 2008

机译：世贸组织上诉机构的自主权，以改变世贸组织的争端解决制度：国际法院和美国最高法院的理论见解和比较分析。
6. Autism funding dispute reaches Supreme Court [O] . 2003

机译：自闭症资金争议到达最高法院
7. ON THE QUESTION OF RESOLUTION OF LABOR DISPUTES BY ARBITRATION COURTS [O] . Светлана Александровна Алешукина 2020

机译：论仲裁法院解决劳动纠纷问题的问题
8. Pesticide Regulation (PR) Notice 94-7. Notice to Manufacturers, Formulators,Registrants and Users of Pesticides: Label Improvement Program for the Revision of Use Directions for Commensal Rodenticides and Statement of the Agency's Policies on the Use of R [R] . 1994

机译：农药监管（pR）公告94-7。关于杀虫剂的制造商，配方设计师，注册人和使用者的通知：修订共生杀鼠剂使用说明的标签改进计划和原子能机构使用R的政策声明

Court questions relevance of 1986 labeling case to rodenticide dispute

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅