• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Thinking About CAS without Thinking about CAS Doctrine: Selected Interactions of Institutional Processes within the Close Air Support Mission.
【24h】

Thinking About CAS without Thinking about CAS Doctrine: Selected Interactions of Institutional Processes within the Close Air Support Mission.

机译：不考虑Cas学说的Cas思考：近距离空中支援任务中机构过程的选择互动。

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

How should the joint force optimize the planning and execution of close air support (CAS). Previous studies have examined CAS from the perspective of service- and platform-specific procedures. This thesis examines how the joint force, as a cohesive whole, can more optimally deliver lethal firepower against any adversary. Using institutional analysis, three clusters of perverse incentives that hinder joint cohesion are examined. These clusters include the following: (1) the perverse incentives arising from rules of engagement intended to address the conduct of 'operations amongst the population,' (2) the lack of interoperability arising from the multiplicity of service-specific platforms, and (3) the significant difference between training and real-world execution of CAS. This study reasons that institutions (which include rules, doctrine, practices, standard operating procedures, etc.) within each cluster generate unintended, path-dependent effects deleterious to cohesive joint air support. The thesis then proposes a new approach to CAS that mitigates these threats and fosters joint cohesion.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号