首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Field Validation of Statistically-Based Acceptance Plan for Bituminous Airport Pavements. Volume 3. Statistical Analysis of Three Methods for Determining Maximum Specific Gravity of Bituminous Concrete Mixtures
【24h】

Field Validation of Statistically-Based Acceptance Plan for Bituminous Airport Pavements. Volume 3. Statistical Analysis of Three Methods for Determining Maximum Specific Gravity of Bituminous Concrete Mixtures

机译:基于统计的沥青机场路面验收计划的现场验证。第3卷。确定沥青混凝土最大比重的三种方法的统计分析

获取原文

摘要

Five replicates of asphaltic concrete at five asphalt contents were produced and tested to compare maximum specific gravities determined by individual constituents, by solvent immersion, and by ASTM D-2041. The effects of variations in asphalt content on the maximum specific gravities obtained by the three methods were also considered. A statistically significant difference was found to exist between the solvent immersion and ASTM D-2041 methods at all five asphalt contents; whereas, no significant difference was found between the solvent immersion and individual constituents methods. There was a significant difference between the ASTM D-2041 method and individual constituents methods. This difference varies with asphalt content. Since the solvent immersion and ASTM D-2041 methods provide statistically different results, it is not appropriate to allow the use of both methods in the same specification unless separate acceptance limits are used. It is recommended that the solvent immersion method be eliminated from use since the ASTM D-2041 procedures are much more commonly used. To avoid the use of a correction factor to convert the ASTM D-2041 values to equivalent individual constituents values, as is currently done, it is recommended that the maximum specific gravity for job mix formula determination be established by the ASTM D-2041 method.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号