• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Understanding Mission Essential Competencies as a Work Analysis Method.
【24h】

Understanding Mission Essential Competencies as a Work Analysis Method.

机译：将使命的基本能力理解为工作分析方法。

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The United States Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), Human Effectiveness Directorate, Warfighter Readiness Research Division, in conjunction with the United States Air Force Major Command, Air Combat Command (ACC), has for a number of years pursued a program of research whose focus is the rational integration of networked flying, flying-related, and command and control simulators into current training via Distributed Mission Operations (DMO). The Mission Essential Competency (MEC) work analysis methodology was developed as one facet of this DMO initiative. The MEC approach addresses multiple AFRL/ACC DMO program needs. Among other purposes, MECs enable the determination of training requirements and the appropriate mix of live operation and virtual training media, allow ACC to identify the 'value' of DMO and provide justification for funding, and directly enable the construction of air combat simulation scenarios for which validated measures can be developed. While much has already been written about the MECs, one particular unaddressed topic relates to the nature of this effort relative to other work analysis and competency methods. How are MECs different from other methods of work analysis. What outcomes does the MEC approach produce that are unique. Is the MEC process rigorous enough to be considered a work analysis method, as Industrial/Organizational Psychologists understand the terminology and process. To address these questions, the authors take a historical-comparative approach. First, they consider the origin and nature of modern job analysis. Second, they do the same for the competency movement. Third, they review in some detail how MECs are developed and used. Fourth and finally, they discuss MECs as a job analytic technique, including some thoughts on the validity of the method.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号