• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国政府科技报告 >JUDICIALLY ENFORCEABLE RIGHTS UNDER NEPA
【24h】

JUDICIALLY ENFORCEABLE RIGHTS UNDER NEPA

机译：NEpa下具有司法权利的司法权利

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) has been interpreted by the courts in many cases since its enactment in 1970. The majority of the cases which address the issue of substantive rights favor sub¬stantive review. But, the standard of review which is used varies depending on the court and the particular factual situ¬ation. Standards of review which have been used by the courts include a balanc¬ing analysis, the "arbitrary and capri¬cious" test, a substantial inquiry, and a good faith compliance with NEPA. The statutory sources of substantive review are sections 101, 102(1), 102(2)B of NEPA. In some cases by applying very strict procedural requirements, courts appear to achieve the substantive goals of NEPA of effecting changes in the federal agency decision- making process. The de-cisions show that the courts are proceeding on a case-by-case basis balancing environmen¬tal and traditional economic factors in order to achieve the substantive policies of NEPA .

著录项

  • 作者

    James C. Wharton;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1975
  • 页码 1-47
  • 总页数 47
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 工业技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号