首页> 外文OA文献 >Political Efficacy and Youth Non-Voting: A Qualitative Investigation into the Attitudes and Experiences of Young Voters and Non-Voters in New Zealand
【2h】

Political Efficacy and Youth Non-Voting: A Qualitative Investigation into the Attitudes and Experiences of Young Voters and Non-Voters in New Zealand

机译:政治效能与青年无投票权:对新西兰年轻选民和非选民的态度和经验的定性调查

摘要

This thesis examines political efficacy and youth non-voting in New Zealand. Drawing from a focus group discussion and depth interviews with 20 young people, I compare and contrast the attitudes and experiences of 18-24 year-old voters and non-voters. I assess whether the theory of political efficacy is a useful conceptual tool for distinguishing between their attitudes, and evaluate the ability of efficacy theory to explain youth non-voting in New Zealand. The thesis draws attention to the oft-overlooked benefits of using qualitative methods to conduct political science research. Based on my research, I find that the standard (quantitative) operationalisation of efficacy obscures the complex and nuanced nature of young people's thoughts about politics. Depth interviews and focus groups are found to be valuable means to gain insight into the political attitudes of young people, as - unlike quantitative methods - they allow participants to elucidate themselves using language and ideas of their own. A purposive sampling strategy using snowball referrals also proved to be a useful way to recruit young non-voters, indicating to future researchers that such an approach may be a good way to access disengaged populations. Contrary to the predictions of efficacy theory and to the findings of research in the quantitative tradition, I find fewer differences between young voters and non-voters than expected: the interviews and focus group in fact reveal surprising similarities in the political efficacy of young voters and non-voters. Through my research I identify three types of young non-voters: 'disinterested', 'inconvenienced' and 'principled' non-voters, each of whom give different and diverse explanations for their non-participation. These findings suggest that the usefulness of efficacy theory as an explanation for youth non-voting may have been overstated, and my research highlights the need to remain open to other explanations for youth electoral disengagement - such as rational choice and post-materialist theories.
机译:本文探讨了新西兰的政治效力和青年无投票权。通过与20名年轻人进行的焦点小组讨论和深度访谈,我比较并对比了18至24岁的选民和非选民的态度和经验。我评估了政治效能理论是否是区分他们态度的有用概念工具,并评估了效能理论解释新西兰未投票年轻人的能力。本文提请人们注意使用定性方法进行政治​​科学研究的经常被忽视的好处。根据我的研究,我发现功效的标准(量化)操作化掩盖了年轻人关于政治思想的复杂而细微的本质。人们发现,深度访谈和焦点小组是了解年轻人的政治态度的宝贵手段,因为与定量方法不同,它们允许参与者使用自己的语言和思想来阐明自己。使用雪球转介的有目的抽样策略也被证明是招募年轻非投票者的有用方法,向未来的研究人员表明,这种方法可能是接触脱离人口的好方法。与功效理论的预测和定量传统研究的结果相反,我发现年轻选民和非选民之间的差异比预期的要少:访谈和焦点小组实际上揭示了年轻选民和非选民在政治效力方面的惊人相似之处。非投票者。通过我的研究,我确定了三种类型的年轻非投票者:“无私”,“不便”和“有原则”的非投票者,每种人对他们的不参与给出了不同而多样的解释。这些发现表明功效理论作为解释青年不投票的有用性可能已经被夸大了,我的研究强调,有必要对青年选举脱离接触的其他解释保持开放态度,例如理性选择和后唯物主义理论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sheerin Celia Anne;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号