• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Sociology as reflexive science: on Bourdieu’s project
【2h】

Sociology as reflexive science: on Bourdieu’s project

机译：社会学作为反身科学：关于布迪厄的项目

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The article focuses on the fact that the consequence of Bourdieu’s death is that we now have to respond specifically to the texts that he produced between 1958 and 2002, rather than to the impact of writing and political action in combination, which was his goal during his life. The article raises general questions about the status of social texts in relation to the practices of philosophy and social scientific enquiry to which Bourdieu must have returned in preparing his final course of lectures, published in 2001 as Science de la science et r�flexivit�. It then offers three case studies of this relationship in action in Bourdieu’s early work, considering his textual and scientific practices. It discusses aspects of the contemporary philosophical debate about the referentiality of texts at the time of this early work and thus indicates that this was a question of continuous importance in Bourdieu’s work. The article next reflects on the significance of Bourdieu’s thinking in this respect for the ways in which we should now respond to his texts and deploy his concepts empirically. It takes three examples of different ways in which Bourdieu’s texts have become pretexts for further research practice. These are characterized as ‘academic exploitation’, ‘nominal appropriation’ and ‘informed divergence’. The conclusion is that Bourdieu’s work demands a reflexive response, which requires that respondents should analyse rigorously their own situations and the grounds for transferring received concepts, and that this entails detailed attention to both Bourdieu’s texts and the contexts of their production, rather than a superficial exploitation or appropriation of his ‘consecrated’ texts.
机译：本文着眼于这样一个事实，即布迪厄之死的后果是我们现在必须对他在1958年至2002年之间撰写的文本做出具体回应，而不是对写作和政治行动相结合的影响做出回应，这是他在任职期间的目标。生活。这篇文章提出了有关社会文本在哲学和社会科学探究实践中的地位的一般性问题，布迪厄在准备他的最后一门课程时必须返回到哲学和社会科学探究中，该论文于2001年作为Science de la science etr�flexivitï¿ 。然后，考虑到布迪厄的文本和科学实践，他提供了三个有关这种关系在鲍迪厄早期作品中的作用的案例研究。它讨论了早期作品发表时有关文本的指称性的当代哲学辩论的各个方面，因此表明这是布迪厄作品中持续重要的问题。接下来，文章将反思布迪厄思想在这方面的重要性，即我们现在应该以何种方式回应他的文本并以经验方式运用他的概念。它以三个不同的方式举例说明了布迪厄的著作成为进一步研究实践的借口。它们的特征是“学术剥削”，“名义上的挪用”和“知情的分歧”。结论是，布迪厄的工作需要反思，要求受访者严格分析自己的处境和转移所接受概念的依据，这需要对布迪厄的案文及其生产环境进行详细关注，而不是肤浅剥夺或挪用他“奉献”的经文。

著录项

  • 作者

    Robbins Derek;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号