首页> 外文OA文献 >Do active labour market policies reduce the harmful effects of job insecurity? Evidence for flexicurity from the EWCS and ESS
【2h】

Do active labour market policies reduce the harmful effects of job insecurity? Evidence for flexicurity from the EWCS and ESS

机译:积极的劳动力市场政策是否可以减少工作不安全感的有害影响? EWCS和ESS的灵活性证据

摘要

Conclusions:The relationship between job insecurity and psychological wellbeing seems to be remarkably unpredictable between countries, independent from their level of claimed or actual flexicurity policies.This calls into doubt one of the important claimed benefits of flexicurity – ameliorating the threat associated with job loss.Why?– Lack of knowledge about active labour market policies, etc?– Psychological attachment is with current job, not "employability"?
机译:结论:国家之间的工作不安全感与心理健康之间的关系似乎非常不可预测,而与要求的或实际的挠性政策的水平无关。这令人怀疑,挠性的重要优势之一–减轻了与失业相关的威胁。为什么?–缺乏有关积极的劳动力市场政策等的知识?–心理依恋与当前的工作有关,而不是“就业能力”?

著录项

  • 作者

    Burchell Brendan J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号