首页> 外文OA文献 >NASA Langley Research Center Systems Analysis Concepts Directorate Participation in the Exploration Systems Architecture Study
【2h】

NASA Langley Research Center Systems Analysis Concepts Directorate Participation in the Exploration Systems Architecture Study

机译:美国宇航局兰利研究中心系统分析与概念局局长参与探索系统架构研究

摘要

The NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) Systems Analysis & Concepts Directorate (SACD) began studying human exploration missions beyond low Earth orbit (LEO) in the year 1999. This included participation in NASA s Decadal Planning Team (DPT), the NASA Exploration Team (NExT), Space Architect studies and Revolutionary Aerospace Systems Concepts (RASC) architecture studies that were used in formulating the new Vision for Space Exploration. In May of 2005, NASA initiated the Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS). The primary outputs of the ESAS activity were concepts and functional requirements for the Crewed Exploration Vehicle (CEV), its supporting launch vehicle infrastructure and identification of supporting technology requirements and investments. An exploration systems analysis capability has evolved to support these functions in the past and continues to evolve to support anticipated future needs. SACD had significant roles in supporting the ESAS study team. SACD personnel performed the liaison function between the ESAS team and the Shuttle/Station Configuration Options Team (S/SCOT), an agency-wide team charged with using the Space Shuttle to complete the International Space Station (ISS) by the end of Fiscal Year (FY) 2010. The most significant of the identified issues involved the ability of the Space Shuttle system to achieve the desired number of flights in the proposed time frame. SACD with support from the Kennedy Space Center performed analysis showing that, without significant investments in improving the shuttle processing flow, that there was almost no possibility of completing the 28-flight sequence by the end of 2010. SACD performed numerous Lunar Surface Access Module (LSAM) trades to define top level element requirements and establish architecture propellant needs. Configuration trades were conducted to determine the impact of varying degrees of segmentation of the living capabilities of the combined descent stage, ascent stage, and other elements. The technology assessment process was developed and implemented by SACD as the ESAS architecture was refined. SACD implemented a rigorous and objective process which included (a) establishing architectural functional needs, (b) collection, synthesis and mapping of technology data, and (c) performing an objective decision analysis resulting in technology development investment recommendations. The investment recommendation provided budget, schedule, and center/program allocations to develop required technologies for the exploration architecture, as well as the identification of other investment opportunities to maximize performance and flexibility while minimizing cost and risk. A summary of the trades performed and methods utilized by SACD for the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate (ESAS) activity is presented along with how SACD is currently supporting the implementation of the Vision for Space Exploration.
机译:NASA兰利研究中心(LaRC)系统分析和概念局(SACD)从1999年开始研究低地球轨道(LEO)以外的人类探索任务。其中包括参加NASA十年计划团队(DPT),NASA探索团队(NExT),空间建筑师研究和革命性航空航天系统概念(RASC)体系结构研究,这些研究用于制定新的空间探索愿景。在2005年5月,NASA发起了探索系统架构研究(ESAS)。 ESAS活动的主要输出是乘员乘船(CEV)的概念和功能要求,其支持的运载火箭基础设施以及确定支持的技术要求和投资。过去,勘探系统分析功能已经发展为支持这些功能,并且仍在不断发展以支持预期的未来需求。 SACD在支持ESAS研究团队方面发挥了重要作用。 SACD人员执行了ESAS团队与航天飞机/空间站配置选择团队(S / SCOT)之间的联络职能,该机构范围内的团队负责使用航天飞机在财政年度结束前完成国际空间站(ISS) (2010财年)。已发现的最重要问题涉及航天飞机系统在建议的时限内实现所需飞行次数的能力。 SACD在肯尼迪航天中心的支持下进行了分析,结果表明,在不花费大量资金改善航天飞机处理流程的情况下,到2010年底几乎不可能完成28趟飞行的序列。SACD执行了许多月球进入模块( LSAM)以定义顶级元素需求和建立架构推进剂需求为目的。进行了配置交易,以确定下降组合阶段,上升阶段和其他元素的生活能力的不同程度分割的影响。随着ESAS体系结构的完善,SACD开发并实施了技术评估流程。 SACD实施了严格而客观的流程,其中包括(a)建立架构功能需求,(b)收集,综合和映射技术数据,以及(c)进行客观的决策分析,从而得出技术开发投资建议。该投资建议提供了预算,进度表和中心/计划分配,以开发勘探架构所需的技术,并确定了其他投资机会,以最大限度地提高性能和灵活性,同时将成本和风险降至最低。概述了SACD用于探索系统任务局(ESAS)活动的交易和使用的方法,以及SACD当前如何支持太空探索愿景的实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号