• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Quality not Quantity: Comparing Interaction Patterns of a Balanced and Non-Balanced Teams Engaged In Model-Building within a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Environment
【2h】

Quality not Quantity: Comparing Interaction Patterns of a Balanced and Non-Balanced Teams Engaged In Model-Building within a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Environment

机译：质量而非数量：比较计算机支持的协作学习（CSCL）环境中从事模型构建的平衡和非平衡团队的交互模式

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Roberts and Nason (2003) found that teams within a CSCL environment balanced by Team Role Preference (TMP) produced better quality knowledge building than non-balanced teams. This study extended the work of Roberts and Nason by investigating the interaction patterns of the balanced and non-balanced teams’ on-line discussion forum discourse utilising the Poole and Holmes (1995) Functional Category System (FSC). This study found that although the non-balanced teams engaged in more interactions than the balanced teams, quantity of interaction did not equate with quality of interaction; the balanced teams demonstrated more efficient and effective knowledge building interactions than non-balanced teams. These findings indicate that CSCL researchers need to focus not only on the quantity but also on the quality of interactions when designing social infrastructures within CSCL environments.
机译：Roberts和Nason（2003）发现，在CSCL环境中，通过团队角色偏好（TMP）进行平衡的团队比不平衡的团队产生的质量知识更好。这项研究通过利用Poole和Holmes（1995）功能类别系统（FSC）研究平衡和非平衡团队的在线讨论论坛讨论的互动模式，扩展了Roberts和Nason的工作。这项研究发现，尽管非平衡团队比平衡团队参与更多的互动，但是互动的数量并不等于互动的质量。平衡的团队比非平衡的团队展示出更有效的知识积累交互。这些发现表明，CSCL研究人员在设计CSCL环境中的社交基础结构时不仅需要关注交互的数量，还需要关注交互的质量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Roberts Alan G.; Nason Rodney A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号