• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Aerobic Training Methods on V02 Max, Body Composition and Anaerobic Power.
【2h】

Comparison of Aerobic Training Methods on V02 Max, Body Composition and Anaerobic Power.

机译：V02 Max，身体成分和无氧力量有氧训练方法的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Recent research has utilized intensity as a primary means to define training methods for improving aerobic capacity (VO2 max). Alternative ways of classifying training techniques must be examined to elucidate optimal practices for aerobic capacity enhancement. PURPOSE: To investigate the potential impact of various aerobic training methods on V02, body composition and anaerobic power. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy male u26 female subjects (18-30yrs) participated in an equated volume supervised running workout for six weeks utilizing two alternate training methods. Group one (N = 17, 21 ± 3 yr) participated in Interval Training Distance (ITD) and group two (N = 17, 21 ± 3 yr) participated in Long Slow Distance (LSD). All subjects participated in a familiarity session (FAM), a Pre-Test (T1) and a Post-Test (T2) . Each testing session consisted of a V02 Max, a 30 second Wingate and body composition assessment. Data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Significance was set at p u3c 0.05 and adopted throughout. RESULTS: The ITD and LSD groups experienced significant increases (p u3c 0 .001) in VO2 max, with 9.05% (4.19 ± 4.15 ml/kg/min) and 3.18% (1.39 ± 3.67 ml/kg/min) increases respectively. A significant interaction (p u3c 0.05) in VO2 max occurred between groups, as the ITD group displayed a 302% greater increase when compared to the LSD group. Body fat percentage significantly decreased (p u3c 0.01) in the ITD (1.08 ± 1.90%) and LSD (1.55 ± 3.21%) groups, while a significant reduction (p u3c 0.05) in total body weight was also observed. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that the ITD training method has a greater impact on aerobic capacity than LSD training method. However, both ITD and LSD training methods had a significant impact on aerobic capacity, body weight, and body composition.
机译：最近的研究已经利用强度作为定义提高有氧能力（VO2 max）的训练方法的主要手段。必须研究对训练技术进行分类的其他方法，以阐明提高有氧能力的最佳方法。目的：研究各种有氧训练方法对V02，身体成分和无氧能力的潜在影响。方法：34名健康的男性 u26女性受试者（18-30岁）使用两种替代训练方法参加了等量的有监督跑步训练，为期6周。第一组（N = 17、21±3年）参加了间歇训练距离（ITD），第二组（N = 17、21±3年）参加了慢慢距离训练（LSD）。所有受试者都参加了熟悉课程（FAM），预测试（T1）和后测试（T2）。每个测试环节均包括V02 Max，30秒Wingate和身体成分评估。通过重复测量的双向方差分析对数据进行分析。显着性设定为p 0.05，并在全文中采用。结果：ITD和LSD组最大摄氧量显着增加（p u3c 0 .001），分别增加9.05％（4.19±4.15 ml / kg / min）和3.18％（1.39±3.67 ml / kg / min） 。各组之间最大摄氧量之间存在显着的交互作用（p <0.05），因为与LSD组相比，ITD组显示出302％的增加。 ITD组（1.08±1.90％）和LSD组（1.55±3.21％）的体脂百分比显着降低（p u3c 0.01），而总体重也显着降低（p u3c 0.05）。结论：本研究的结果表明，ITD训练方法比LSD训练方法对有氧运动能力的影响更大。但是，ITD和LSD训练方法都对有氧运动能力，体重和身体成分产生重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号