• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Defensive practice as ‘fear-based’ practice: Social work’s open secret?
【2h】

Defensive practice as ‘fear-based’ practice: Social work’s open secret?

机译：作为“基于恐惧”的做法的防御性做法：社会工作的公开秘密？

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Defensive practice has received attention through the Munro review of child protection, which has identified that current organisational cultures increase the likelihood of defensive practice. Whilst the wider socio-political climate that gives rise to defensive practice has been explored within the literature, little attention has been paid to the everyday realities of defensive practice. This paper reports the findings of a study into final year social work students' attitudes towards defensive practice within social work. Three focus groups were completed with a total of ninety final-year students that collected qualitative and quantitative data using interactive software. This paper examines how participants perceived defensive practice, both in general and when faced with real-life vignettes. Participants distinguished between pro-active behaviour (sins of commission) and passive behaviour (sins of omission), generally regarding the latter as less serious because it was less tangible and easier to attribute to more positive motives. Whilst the literature identifies defensive practice as deliberate behaviour, the focus group discussions suggest that it is a subtler and less conscious process. Whilst there was there was a general consensus about the nature of defensive practice, there was considerable disagreement about specific vignettes and several competing explanations are explored.
机译：通过对儿童保护的Munro审查​​，防御实践受到了关注，该评估确定了当前的组织文化增加了防御实践的可能性。尽管在文献中已经探究了引起防御性实践的更广泛的社会政治氛围，但很少有人关注防御性实践的日常现实。本文报告了对最后一年的社会工作学生对社会工作中的防御实践态度的研究结果。三个焦点小组完成了，总共有90名最后一年的学生，他们使用交互式软件收集了定性和定量数据。本文研究了参与者在一般情况下以及面对现实的小插曲时如何看待防御性行为。参与者区分了主动行为（犯有犯罪行为）和被动行为（犯有犯罪行为），通常认为后者较不严重，因为它没有那么明显，更容易归因于更积极的动机。尽管文献将防御性实践确定为故意行为，但焦点小组的讨论表明，这是一个微妙且意识不足的过程。尽管人们对防御实践的性质达成了普遍共识，但对于特定的小插曲存在很大的分歧，并探讨了几种相互竞争的解释。

著录项

  • 作者

    Whittaker A; Havard T;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号