首页> 外文OA文献 >Religion and national identity in the Greek and Greek-Cypriot political cultures.
【2h】

Religion and national identity in the Greek and Greek-Cypriot political cultures.

机译:希腊和希腊 - 塞浦路斯政治文化中的宗教和民族认同。

摘要

This thesis investigates the reasons for the idiosyncratic politicization of religion and the Church in Greece and Cyprus, and seeks to account for the production, development and propagation of religious nationalism and the sacralisation of politics in these two countries. It is a study of the birth (1830- 1864), development, and contemporary mutation (1974-2000) of the 'Helleno- Christian' nationalist discourse, which reached its zenith, not in Greece, where it was born, but in Cyprus, immediately before and after independence (1950- 1974). The aim of the project is to explain the political processes whereby this ideology (Helleno-Christianism) attained a hegemonic status in the Greek and Greek-Cypriot political cultures, and to account for the present eminence of this prominent type of Greek nationalism. Hopefully, this thesis fulfils a threefold purpose: firstly, it covers importcint gaps in the relevant historiography on Greek and Greek-Cypriot nationalisms. This 'historical' task is carried out through the analysis of the important role of the Orthodox Church in the consolidation of Greek and Greek-Cypriot national identities. Secondly, this case study is used as a test ground for an alternative theoretical framework in the study of nationalism which may offer solutions to the practical and theoretical problems of the dominant modernist pciradigm. Thirdly, a comparative approach to the study of Greek nationalism in mainland Greece and in Cyprus is adopted- to my knowledge, for the first time- in the following pages. There are two main research questions to be answered by this project: Why and how religion in Greece and Cyprus has been politicized in such manner so that Orthodoxy and nationalism became so closely associated? And, what are the results of this politicization in terms of contemporary Church policy, and national identity awareness in contemporary Greece and Cyprus? In other words, the logic that will be underlying my argument is that in order to understand contemporary Greek nationalism, one has to look back at its formative period.
机译:本文研究了希腊和塞浦路斯的宗教和教堂特质政治化的原因,力图解释这两个国家宗教民族主义的产生,发展和传播以及政治的神圣化。它是对“希腊基督教徒”民族主义话语的诞生(1830年至1864年),发展和当代突变(1974-2000年)的研究,这种话语达到了顶峰,而不是在其出生地希腊,而是在塞浦路斯,独立前后(1950年至1974年)。该项目的目的是解释这种意识形态(希腊基督教)在希腊和希族塞人政治文化中获得霸权地位的政治过程,并说明这种杰出的希腊民族主义在当前的地位。希望本论文可以达到三个目的:首先,它涵盖了有关希腊和希族塞人民族主义的相关史学中的重要差距。通过分析东正教在巩固希腊和希族塞人民族身份中的重要作用来完成这项“历史性”任务。其次,本案例研究被用作民族主义研究的替代理论框架的试验场,该理论框架可以为解决占主导地位的现代主义皮拉迪根的实践和理论问题提供解决方案。第三,据我所知,以下几页首次采用了比较方法研究希腊大陆和塞浦路斯的希腊民族主义。这个项目有两个主要的研究问题要回答:为什么和如何将希腊和塞浦路斯的宗教政治化,以使正教与民族主义如此紧密地联系在一起?而且,就当代教会政策以及当代希腊和塞浦路斯的民族认同意识而言,这种政治化的结果是什么?换句话说,我的论点所依据的逻辑是,为了理解当代希腊民族主义,必须回顾其形成时期。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chrysoloras Nikolaos;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号