首页> 外文OA文献 >An investigation into the funding criteria used by funding organisations in New Zealand
【2h】

An investigation into the funding criteria used by funding organisations in New Zealand

机译:对新西兰供资组织使用的供资标准的调查

摘要

This research project aims to investigate the funding criteria adopted by funding organisations in New Zealand. The qualitative research methodology and semi-structured interview method is adopted to investigate the critical pieces of information, both financial and non-financial, that is utilised by funding organisations in grant-making decisions. The most important finding of this research project is that there is no strong pattern emerging as to how funding organisations determine how to allocate their funds. Outcomes and key people are important to funders but much of the financial information is less regarded and there is no consistent approach. To explain this lack of established criteria, it is noted from the literature and borne out by this research that many trustees and managers in NFP organisations often lack expertise in business, especially in accounting and management. Idealism and enthusiasm compensates for business skills. Thus, much of the funding organisations' allocations rely on instinctive feel for the projects proposed and the character of the applicants proposing them. The Charities Commission may be able to help funding organisations refine their approach by introducing a standard guidance statement. To this end, the research findings of this study may be useful a reference. More explicitly, recommendations are made. The additional benefit to the NFP organisations seeking funds is these recommendations would indicate what would be more relevant information to grant-making decisions of funding organisations.
机译:该研究项目旨在调查新西兰资助组织所采用的资助标准。采用定性研究方法和半结构化面试方法来调查财务信息和非财务信息,供资助组织在赠款决策中使用。该研究项目最重要的发现是,关于供资组织如何确定其资金分配方式,目前还没有出现明显的模式。成果和关键人物对资助者很重要,但是很多财务信息很少被考虑,并且没有一致的方法。为了解释这种缺乏既定标准的情况,从文献中注意到并通过本研究证实,NFP组织中的许多受托人和管理人员通常缺乏业务方面的专业知识,尤其是在会计和管理方面。理想主义和热情补偿了业务技能。因此,许多供资组织的拨款都取决于拟议项目的直觉和拟议项目的申请人的特征。慈善事务委员会可以通过引入标准指导声明来帮助资助组织完善其方法。为此,本研究的研究结果可能是有用的参考。更明确地说,提出了建议。 NFP组织寻求资金的额外好处是这些建议将表明,与资助组织的拨款决策相比,哪些信息更为相关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Huang Hedy Jiaying;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号