摘要:
Taking Jiangning district, Nanjing city and Yinzhou district, Ningbo city as cases, this paper focuses on the difference between the two metropolitan suburbs affected by different industrialization modes and the logic mechanism. After the comparison, this article finds the two suburbs show obvious differences regarding economic and social development, space management and utilization. After deep analysis, this paper proposes a framework to understand the internal mechanism. Under the leadership of enterprise oriented government, the suburb influenced by the New Southern Jiangsu Development Mode achieves a leap forward development of industry through the building of development zones and attracting foreign investment, which is beneficial to economy growth and financial income, and the centralization of space management and using is a result of self-reinforcing effect. Meanwhile, the suburb affected by Zhejiang Mode which has a weaker government intervention develops slowly mainly relying on the local small enterprises, also it is beneficial to the creation of employment opportunities and income distribution. In order to meet the needs of economic and social development, the district of Zhejiang gives more space management power to the town unit and the utilization of industrial space is more dispersed. Finally, based on their respective advantages and disadvantages, this paper offers the optimization guidance strategies.%以"新苏南模式"影响下的南京市江宁区和"浙江模式"影响下的宁波市鄞州区为例,研究不同工业化模式对"撤县设区"型大都市郊区发展的影响及内在机制.对比发现两者在经济社会发展、空间管理与利用方面均存在差异.探究其内在的逻辑机制,认为在经济全球化的共同背景下,"新苏南模式"影响下的大都市郊区在企业型政府主导下,通过开发区建设吸引大型外资企业入驻,实现了产业嫁接跨越式发展,表现出增长友好与财政友好特点,以区层面为主的空间管理集权和产业空间利用集中是自我强化的结果."浙江模式"影响下的大都市郊区,政府干预较弱,表现为以本地小微企业为主的产业渐进发展,这有利于就业机会创造和财富分配,而为了适应经济社会发展需要,空间管理向街镇单元分权更多,产业空间利用也更为分散.最后针对各自的优势与问题,提出优化策略建议.