• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Conference on People Shaping Places Shaping People; 2003; Minneapolis, Minnesota >Environmental Quality-Shaping Places for People: A Systemic Framework for Conceptualizing People and their Workplaces
【24h】

Environmental Quality-Shaping Places for People: A Systemic Framework for Conceptualizing People and their Workplaces

机译：环境质量塑造场所：将人们及其工作场所概念化的系统框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Both the behavioral sciences and the traditional engineering/architecture disciplines have failed to conceptualize the office environment in a comprehensive way. This paper proposes a framework for evaluating environmental quality of offices from a systemic epistemology that rests on the idea that the environment is an organic structure; it has parts that are connected to each other by complex interactions in a way that smaller parts of the system can be identified: it has components, processes, products, and outcomes that can be dissected into sub-systems. Thus acknowledging complex interactions between people (employees) and their buildings (offices) under four levels of analysis: (1) the micro-level relates to the individual and his/her setting, (2) the mini-level is for groups and their workspace. (3) the macro-level relates to organization and its building, and (ft) the mega level is concerned with society and the surrounding environment. The product of these four interactions is the "attributes" of place, that define the environment "as experienced" by its users. This paper will elaborate on this proposed framework with interdisciplinary research examples from the fields of architecture, engineering, and environmental psychology. It relies on the general assumption that any environment is composed of "people" and "buildings" on the macro-scale as well as "buildings" and the overall "environment" on the mega-scale. The product of these systems of interaction between people and buildings are thus evaluated through the proposed definition of Total Environmental Quality of place experience. Furthermore, one can place this concept of environmental quality in a larger framework using it as a tool to understand, assess, and evaluate office environments. The hope is to spur future investigations of office environments to adopt this model and investigate the interaction of symbolic, latent, and physical functions of the environment and their affect on office quality and productivity. "I believe that the major justification for the profession of architecture is that it should contribute to the quality of life for people by improving the quality of their physical environment. Without understanding the meaning people give to environments, it is very difficult to know what constitutes "improvement" or "quality." Basil Honikman, Environmental Knowing, 1976.
机译：行为科学和传统工程/建筑学科都未能以全面的方式概念化办公环境。本文提出了一个从系统认识论出发评估办公室环境质量的框架，该框架基于环境是有机结构的思想。它具有通过复杂的交互相互连接的部分，从而可以识别系统的较小部分：它具有可以分解为子系统的组件，过程，产品和结果。因此，在四个分析层次上确认了人（雇员）与其建筑物（办公室）之间的复杂交互：（1）微观层次与个人及其环境有关；（2）最小层次与群体及其个人有关。工作区。 （3）宏观层面与组织及其建设有关，而（ft）宏观层面与社会和周围环境有关。这四个交互作用的结果就是位置的“属性”，它定义了用户“所体验”的环境。本文将利用来自建筑，工程和环境心理学领域的跨学科研究实例来详细阐述该框架。它基于一般的假设，即任何环境都由宏观上的“人”和“建筑物”以及大规模上的“建筑物”和整体“环境”组成。因此，通过对场所体验的总体环境质量的建议定义，可以评估人与建筑物之间这些交互系统的产品。此外，可以将环境质量的概念放在一个更大的框架中，将其用作理解，评估和评估办公环境的工具。希望能够刺激人们对办公环境的进一步研究，以采用此模型，并研究环境的符号，潜在和物理功能之间的相互作用以及它们对办公质量和生产率的影响。 “我认为，建筑专业的主要理由是，它应该通过改善人们的自然环境质量来为人们的生活质量做出贡献。在不了解人们赋予环境的意义的情况下，很难知道构成什么“改进”或“质量”。BasilHonikman，《环境知识》，1976年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号