• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>DASIA 2005 >A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PMBOK/DOD ANDECSS/MANAGEMENT PROCESS FOR SOFTWARE ACQUISITION
【24h】

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PMBOK/DOD ANDECSS/MANAGEMENT PROCESS FOR SOFTWARE ACQUISITION

机译：PMBOK / DOD与ECSS /管理过程进行软件获取的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article presents a comparative study between the ECSS standards, more specifically inrnterms of the requirements of the ECSS software management process and the defense-intensivernprocesses of PMBOK DoD. Since there is a sense that a complete comparisonrnstudy is a lengthy process, the scope of comparison is restricted to space softwarernacquisition. Most of the software systems are developed under contracts in which therngovernment is the customer and the contractor is generally a space industry company. Bothrngovernment and industry use project management processes in order to build the requiredrnsystem successfully within cost, time, quality, and risk requirements. On the contractingrnside (government) there are two well known approaches for project management forrnsoftware acquisition: PMBOK and ECSS. The motivation is to facilitate the relationshiprnbetween customer and software provider when the customer is a space agency who isrnfamiliar with ECSS processes and the software provider is familiar with the practices of thernPMBOK guide. The results of this comparison demonstrate that there is a great deal ofrnsimilarity in terms of what is expected in ECSS and what the PMBOK DoD can provide.rnWe believe that the study can diminish the gap between the two approaches and provide arnbetter understanding of the ECSS for the aerospace industry, which is used to the practicesrnof PMBOK.
机译：本文介绍了ECSS标准之间的比较研究，更具体地讲，是ECSS软件管理过程和PMBOK DoD防御密集型过程的要求的术语。由于感觉到完整的比较研究是一个漫长的过程，因此比较的范围仅限于太空软件的获取。大多数软件系统是根据合同开发的，其中政府是客户，承包商通常是航天工业公司。政府和行业都使用项目管理流程，以便在成本，时间，质量和风险要求范围内成功构建所需的系统。在合同方面（政府），有两种众所周知的软件购买项目管理方法：PMBOK和ECSS。动机是当客户是熟悉ECSS流程的航天机构并且软件提供商熟悉PMBOK指南的实践时，促进客户与软件提供商之间的关系。比较的结果表明，在ECSS中预期的内容和PMBOK DoD可以提供的内容方面存在很大的相似性。我们相信，这项研究可以缩小这两种方法之间的差距，并提供对ECSS的更好的理解。航空业，习惯了PMBOK。

著录项

  • 来源
    《DASIA 2005》|2005年|1-10|共10页
  • 会议地点 Edinburgh(GB);Edinburgh(GB)
  • 作者

    Maria de Fátima Mattiello-Francisco; rnRonaldo Arias; rnCelso Massaki Hirata; rnEdgar Toshiro Yano; rnBenedito M. Sakugawa;

  • 作者单位

    National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Av dos Astronautas,1758 – CX 515rn12227010, S?o José dos Campos, SP, Brazil fatima@dss.inpe.br;

    National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Av dos Astronautas,1758 – CX 515rn12227010, S?o José dos Campos, SP, Brazil;

    National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Av dos Astronautas,1758 – CX 515rn12227010, S?o José dos Campos, SP, Brazil;

    National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Av dos Astronautas,1758 – CX 515rn12227010, S?o José dos Campos, SP, Brazil;

    National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Av dos Astronautas,1758 – CX 515rn12227010, S?o José dos Campos, SP, Brazil;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号