首页> 外文会议>Lasers in Surgery: Advanced Characterization, Therapeutics, and Systems VIII >Combination of thermocoagulation and vaporization using an Nd:YAG/KTP laser versus TURP in BPH treatment: results of a multicenter prospective study
【24h】

Combination of thermocoagulation and vaporization using an Nd:YAG/KTP laser versus TURP in BPH treatment: results of a multicenter prospective study

机译:Nd:YAG / KTP激光与TURP在BPH治疗中热凝和汽化的结合:多中心前瞻性研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract: Laser treatment of BPH as minimally invasive therapy has found wide employment in the last few years. The objective here was to study the effects of combined technique of coagulation and vaporization with an Nd:YAG/KTP laser on BPH compared to TURP. Thirty-eight patients presenting symptomatic BPH were randomized and treated either by a laser coagulation/vaporization using an ADD fiber at settings of 40 - 60 W for the Nd:YAG and of 36 W for the KTP alike in 21 cases or by TURP in 17 cases. Symptom score, uroflow and residual urine were assessed preoperatively at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. No transfusion in any group. Similar postoperative catheterization time. Treatment failure in 2 TURP patients and in 2 laser patients. Comparing AUA score, Qmax and residual urine, both forms of treatment were similar at 1 year. Nd:YAG/KTP laser is equivalent to TURP at 1 year for around 40 g prostates. !3
机译:摘要:近年来,BPH的激光治疗作为微创治疗已得到广泛应用。此处的目的是研究与TURP相比,Nd:YAG / KTP激光结合凝结和汽化联合技术对BPH的影响。 38例出现症状性BPH的患者被随机分配,并使用ADD光纤对Nd:YAG设置为40-60 W,对KTP设置为36 W,通过激光凝固/汽化治疗21例,或采用TURP进行治疗(17)案件。术前1、3、6和12个月评估症状评分,尿流和残余尿量。任何组均无输血。术后导管插入时间相似。 2例TURP患者和2例激光患者的治疗失败。比较AUA评分,Qmax和残余尿量,两种治疗形式在1年时相似。 Nd:YAG / KTP激光相当于大约40 g前列腺1年时的TURP。 !3

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号