• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International conference on public administration >Who Comes First? Matters of Tobacco Intervention in Health, Ethics, and Accountability: A Comparative Analysis of China and the United States
【24h】

Who Comes First? Matters of Tobacco Intervention in Health, Ethics, and Accountability: A Comparative Analysis of China and the United States

机译：谁是第一个？烟草干预造成健康，道德和问责制的事项：对中国和美国的比较分析

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Health and public policies intersect in matters of tobacco use intervention. The myriad problems stemming from tobacco in the United States, for example, beg considerations ethical choices and government service.1 Therefore, a theory of administrative accountability becomes important in our examination of key administrative decisions and actions on tobacco control that appear to have demanded ethical choices in determining appropriate administrative behavior. Such theory supports the principle that government, as the most effective advocate for measures which protect citizens, should promote ethical public policy, i.e. that which safeguards the public interest, including public health and regional economy. We found theoretical accountability clearly applicable to exploration of Chinese and American government tobacco control interventions that attempt to curtail rates of mortality and morbidity associated with tobacco use and exposure. This paper first provides the background in which tobacco use and its impacts in the U.S. and China can be discerned. That overview includes an examination of demographic and cultural dimensions of the tobacco problem, as well as the challenges the two countries face in curtailing tobacco use. Based on data from the World Health Organization (WHO), the Global Youth Tobacco Survey, the Global Adult Tobacco Survey, CDC reports on China and the U.S., and the Global Tobacco Epidemic, we cross-analyze China and U.S tobacco access, consumer use, tobacco marketing and government tobacco control efforts and policies. The author concludes with reflection of "lessons learned" that may be helpful in global efforts to impede the devastating results of tobacco use, as well as identify emerging trends and ways governments, globally, can safeguard the public's U. S. interest.
机译：健康和公共政策在烟草使用干预方面交叉。例如，在美国烟草源于烟草的无数问题，乞求考虑道德选择和政府服务.1因此，行政问责制的理论在我们对迄今为止所要求道德的关键行政决定和行动的审查方面变得重要在确定适当的行政行为时选择。这种理论支持政府作​​为保护公民的措施最有效的倡导者的原则，应该促进道德公共政策，即保护公共利益，包括公共卫生和区域经济。我们发现明确适用于探索中美政府烟草控制干预措施的理论问责，试图减少与烟草使用和暴露有关的死亡率和发病率的率。本文首先提供了烟草使用及其在美国和中国的影响的背景。概述包括审查烟草问题的人口统计和文化维度，以及两国在缩减烟草使用时面临的挑战。基于来自世界卫生组织（世卫组织）的数据，全球青年烟草调查，全球成人烟草调查，CDC关于中国和美国的报告，以及全球烟草流行，我们交叉分析中国和美国烟草进入，消费者使用，烟草营销和政府烟草控制努力和政策。作者结束了“经验教训”，这可能有助于阻碍烟草使用的毁灭性结果，以及全球各国政府确定新兴趋势和方向，可以保护公众的美国。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号