• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Academy of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 2008(创新与创业国际学术会议)论文集 >Meeting Contradictory Innovation Demands:A Conceptual Model for Symbolic-substantive Innovation Choice in a Transitional Economy
【24h】

Meeting Contradictory Innovation Demands:A Conceptual Model for Symbolic-substantive Innovation Choice in a Transitional Economy

机译：满足矛盾的创新需求：转轨经济中象征性实质性创新选择的概念模型

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework for firms facing innovation decisions in response to institutional and market demands, especially in the context of a transitional economy like China. Relatively few researches in the literature cover on how Chinese firms can manage symbolic and substantive innovations ambidextrously, and our paper intends to make a contribution to this gap. Based on the innovation literature, our model suggests that firms have to prioritize between symbolic or institutionally based innovation and substantive-radical innovation under different interactive combinations of institutional and market pressures, which may at times contradictory to each other. The key to match the appropriate innovative response with the external demand lies in the accurate interpretation of the decision impact by the firm, and this managerial perception and the subsequent innovation orientation are in turn moderated by factors such as social capital accumulated with the external parties, the firm size as well as ownership type. Social capital is important as it helps firms to make better sense out of ambiguous policies through the managers' interactions with significant stakeholders. Ownership style influences how managers interpret environmental turbulences as either opportunistic or unnecessary risky. Lastly, we argue that firms having the right size may have a better chance of striking a balance between organizational inertia against change and resource slack for innovation, as well as in mitigating external uncertainties.
机译：在本文中，我们为面对制度和市场需求而面临创新决策的公司提出了一个概念框架，特别是在像中国这样的转轨经济环境下。相对较少的文献研究涉及中国企业如何灵活地管理象征性和实质性创新，我们的论文旨在为这一差距做出贡献。基于创新文献，我们的模型表明，在制度压力和市场压力的不同互动组合下，企业必须在基于符号或制度的创新与基于实质性的创新之间进行优先级排序，这有时可能相互矛盾。使适当的创新响应与外部需求相匹配的关键在于对公司决策影响的准确解释，而这种管理观念和随后的创新方向又受到诸如与外部各方积累的社会资本，公司规模以及所有权类型。社会资本很重要，因为它可以帮助企业通过管理者与重要利益相关者的互动来更好地理解模糊的政策。所有权风格会影响管理者如何将环境动荡解释为机会主义风险或不必要的风险。最后，我们认为，规模合适的公司在组织变革的惯性与创新的资源松弛之间以及减轻外部不确定性之间取得平衡的机会更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号