IDeALL: Investigating design-for-all and living-lab methods for engaging users in value co-creation

机译：IDEALL：调查所有和生活实验室方法，用于参与价值共同创造的用户

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This paper presents a case study for comparing five different design methods in terms of capacity to engage all stakeholders, including users, in the design process and their impacts on technology acceptance and solution adoption by users. These five design methods have been applied within ten design cases accordingly to the Living Lab approach, which is based on an open innovation ecosystem. The ten design cases were voluntarily chosen from different sectors in order to compare the selected design/LL methods whatever is the project context. The actual findings reveal the complementarity between technology acceptance, which is more induced by an individual perception, and solution adoption, which is more generated through social and trust influences, in forging the appropriation mechanism.

机译：本文提出了一种案例研究，用于比较五种不同的设计方法，以在设计过程中与所有利益相关者（包括用户）的能力，包括用户的影响以及用户通过用户采用的影响。这五种设计方法已在十个设计案件内应用于生活实验室方法，该方法是基于开放式创新生态系统。十个设计案例是自愿选择的来自不同部门，以比较所选择的设计/ LL方法是项目上下文。实际调查结果揭示了技术验收之间的互补性，这些互补性是通过社会和信任影响的个人感知和解决方案采用，在锻造拨款机制方面是更加生成的。

著录项

来源
《International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation》|2014年||共8页
会议地点
作者
Mangyoku Mikael; Verilhac Isabelle; Pallot Marc; Aragall Francesc; Serra Artur; Sanchez Laia; Vuontisjarvi Hanna-Riina;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类工程材料学;
关键词
Conferences; Design methodology; Gold; Interviews; Production; Technological innovation; Usability; co-creation; design-for-all; design-method; living-lab; open-innovation-ecosystem; user-centred-design;

机译：会议;设计方法;金;采访;生产;技术创新;可用性;共同创造;设计 - 所有;设计 - 方法;生活实验室;开放式 - 创新 - 生态系统;用户中心设计;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Healthcare service users as resource integrators: investigating factors influencing the co-creation of value at individual, dyadic and systemic levels [J] . Virlee Justine Brigitte, Hammedi Wafa, van Riel Allard C. R. Journal of Service Theory and Practice . 2020,第3期

机译：医疗服务用户作为资源集成商：影响个人，二元和全身水平的共同创造价值的调查因素
2. A Comparison of Internet-Based Participant Recruitment Methods: Engaging the Hidden Population of Cannabis Users in Research [J] . Elizabeth Clare Temple, Rhonda Frances Brown Journal of research practice . 2012,第2期

机译：基于Internet的参与者招募方法的比较：吸引隐性大麻用户参与研究
3. Design for Social Accessibility Method Cards: Engaging Users and Reflecting on Social Scenarios for Accessible Design [J] . KRISTEN SHINOHARA, NAYERI JACOBO, WANDA PRATT, ACM transactions on accessible computing . 2019,第4期

机译：社交可访问性方法卡的设计：吸引用户并思考可访问性设计的社会场景
4. IDeALL: Investigating design-for-all and living-lab methods for engaging users in value co-creation [C] . Mangyoku Mikael, Verilhac Isabelle, Pallot Marc, 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation . 2014

机译：IDeALL：研究“全能设计”和“活实验室”方法，以使用户参与价值共创
5. Measuring satisfaction in usability tests: A comparison of questionnaire administration methods and an investigation into users' rationales for satisfaction. [D] . Zazelenchuk, Todd William. 2002

机译：在可用性测试中衡量满意度：比较问卷管理方法和调查用户满意度的理由。
6. Respondent driven sampling is an effective method for engaging methamphetamine users in HIV prevention research in South Africa [O] . Stephen M. Kimani, Melissa H. Watt, M. Giovanna Merli, -1

机译：受访者驱动的抽样是使甲基苯丙胺使用者参与南非艾滋病毒预防研究的有效方法
7. Engaging users in branding: from ignorance to co-creation [O] . Nadezhda V. Margazova 2019

机译：在品牌中吸引用户：从无知到共同创造

IDeALL: Investigating design-for-all and living-lab methods for engaging users in value co-creation

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅