• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference >Differences in Grade Outcomes Between ICT Engineering and Computer Science Degrees
【24h】

Differences in Grade Outcomes Between ICT Engineering and Computer Science Degrees

机译：ICT工程学位与计算机科学学位的成绩差异

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This full-paper relates to research on the effectiveness of GPA thresholding as a predictor of eventual grade performance in engineering study. Rather than rely on High School grades as a predictor of eventual success in tertiary (ICT-related) engineering, we have adopted a more open-entry model, but require a high performance from the students over their compulsory first year courses in order to progress in engineering study. In this paper we examine whether this is a satisfactory predictor of eventual student success (based on grade performance), or is it that issues such as High-School to University transition unduly negatively influence these grades and lead to a decision not to allow an otherwise capable student to progress. To examine this, we compare student GPAs and graduation rates between a four year Bachelor of Engineering and a three year Bachelor of Science degree which share similar courses. The hypothesis to test is whether students who have been excluded from continuing with Engineering study are in fact capable of passing the advanced level technical courses.
机译：这篇全文涉及GPA阈值作为工程研究中最终成绩表现的预测指标的有效性的研究。我们没有采用高中成绩来预测高等教育（ICT相关）工程的最终成功，而是采用了更开放的模型，但是要求学生在必修的第一年课程中取得较高的成绩才能取得进步在工程研究中。在本文中，我们检查了这是否可以令人满意地预测学生的最终成功（基于年级表现），还是诸如高中向大学过渡等问题对这些成绩产生了不利的负面影响，并导致决定不批准其他成绩有能力的学生进步。为了对此进行检验，我们比较了共享相似课程的四年制工程学士学位和三年制理科学士学位的学生GPA和毕业率。要检验的假设是，实际上被排除在继续工程学习之外的学生是否能够通过高级技术课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号