• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Electromagnetic Compatibility Symposium Record, 1968 IEEE >Young researchers' views on the current and future state of HRI
【24h】

Young researchers' views on the current and future state of HRI

机译：年轻研究者对HRI现状和未来的看法

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper presents the results of a panel discussion titled “The Future of HRI,” held during an NSF workshop for graduate students on human-robot interaction in August 2006. The panel divided the workshop into groups tasked with inventing models of the field, and then asked these groups their opinions on the future of the field. In general, the workshop participants shared the belief that HRI can and should be seen as a single scientific discipline, despite the fact that it encompasses a variety of beliefs, methods, and philosophies drawn from several “core” disciplines in traditional areas of study. HRI researchers share many interrelated goals, participants felt, and enhancing the lines of communication between different areas would help speed up progress in the field. Common concerns included the unavailability of common robust platforms, the emphasis on human perception over robot perception, and the paucity of longitudinal real-world studies. The authors point to the current lack of consensus on research paradigms and platforms to argue that the field is not yet in the phase that philosopher Thomas Kuhn would call “normal science,” but believe the field shows signs of approaching that phase.
机译：本文介绍了题为“ HRI的未来”的小组讨论的结果，该小组讨论是在2006年8月为研究生举办的关于人机交互的NSF研讨会上举行的。小组将研讨会划分为多个小组，负责研究该领域的模型，并然后向这些小组询问他们对该领域的未来的看法。总体而言，研讨会的参与者都认为HRI可以而且应该被视为一门科学学科，尽管它涵盖了从传统研究领域的多个“核心”学科中汲取的各种信念，方法和理念。与会者认为，HRI研究人员具有许多相互关联的目标，并且加强不同领域之间的沟通渠道将有助于加快该领域的进展。常见的担忧包括无法使用通用的强大平台，相对于机器人感知更强调人类感知，以及纵向真实世界研究的匮乏。作者指出，目前在研究范式和平台上尚无共识，认为该领域尚未处于哲学家托马斯·库恩（Thomas Kuhn）称之为“正常科学”的阶段，但他认为该领域显示出接近该阶段的迹象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号