• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Conference on Computer-Generated Forces and Behavior Representation >Modeling Maneuver Warfare: Incorporating Human Factors and Decision-making in Combat Modeling
【24h】

Modeling Maneuver Warfare: Incorporating Human Factors and Decision-making in Combat Modeling

机译：建模机动战：在战斗建模中纳入人类因素和决策

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Most current models of combat are based on an attrition warfare paradigm, where destruction of enemy forces and material are the objectives. Models based on attrition warfare approaches generally ignore the human processes that lead to victory. An attrition approach to modeling is in variance with modern doctrine of Maneuver Warfare. For example, current U.S. Marine Corps doctrine of Maneuver Warfare recognizes that "the results of maneuver are both physical and moral. The object of maneuver is to shatter the enemy's cohesion, organization, command, and psychological balance." Clearly, any model that does not incorporate "cohesion, organization, command, and psychological balance" cannot reflect the relative strengths and weaknesses of Maneuver Warfare. A serious handicap has been the lack of a conceptual model of Maneuver Warfare on a level that could be incorporated into computer simulations. This presentation outlines a conceptual model of Maneuver Warfare in the form of a Causal Model of Combat, a set of interrelated theoretical propositions describing a causal relationship between combat actions and outcomes. The scope of the model runs from non-combat "deterrence" operations through major wars. It defines and models the sources of victory, incorporates human factors such as morale, cohesion, cooperation, coordination, and fighting spirit, and creates a conceptual model of the degradation of command processes when under stress. The objective is to provide a common taxonomy, define interrelationships, and serve as a springboard towards a more detailed algorithmic-level development of a model of Maneuver Warfare for computer applications.
机译：战斗目前大多数车型都基于一个消耗战的范例，其中敌军和材料的破坏是目标。基于消耗战模型方法通常忽略了走向胜利的人的过程。减员建模方法与机动作战的现代主义差异。例如，当前的机动作战的美国陆战队道理承认：“演习的结果是身体和道德的。演习的目的是粉碎敌人的凝聚力，组织，指挥和心理平衡。”显然，这并不包括“团结，组织，指挥，心理平衡”任何模型不能反映相对优势和机动战的弱点。严重的缺陷是缺乏机动战的上一个层次的概念模型，可以纳入计算机模拟。该演讲概述机动战的作战中的因果模型，一组描述的作战行动和结果之间的因果关系相互关联的理论命题形式的概念模型。从非战斗“威慑”的操作模式运行，通过大规模战争的范围。它定义和模式胜利的来源，结合了人的因素，如士气，凝聚力，合作，协调和拼搏精神，并创建命令处理的压力之下时，退化的概念模型。我们的目标是提供一个通用的分类，定义相互关系，以及作为一个跳板向机动作战的计算机应用模型的更详细的算法层次发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号