• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>MEDINFO >Differing Faculty and Housestaff Acceptance of an Electronic Health Record One-Year After Implementation
【24h】

Differing Faculty and Housestaff Acceptance of an Electronic Health Record One-Year After Implementation

机译：在实施后一年后，不同的教师和HouseStaff接受电子健康记录

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In order to determine whether differences exist between house-staff and faculty physician acceptance of an electronic health record system, we conducted a written survey of attitudes towards new electronic medical record at the University of Illinois at Chicago. We surveyed 330 faculty and housestaff physicians. User acceptance of the EHR was high for both faculty physicians and housestaff. 88.0% of the housestaff and 64.7% of the faculty preferred the EHR over a paper record. Although both house-staff and faculty acceptance of an EHR was high, housestaff showed greater approval ratings than faculty. Central to acceptance of an EHR is conservation of physician time including improving system speed, reducing time spent waiting for a computer to become available, and minimizing time spent documenting care.
机译：为了确定家庭人员和教师医师的审理之间是否存在差异，我们对芝加哥伊利诺伊大学对伊利诺伊大学的新电子病历进行了书面调查。我们调查了330名教师和HouseStaff医生。用户接受EHR对于教师和HouseStaff来说都很高。 88.0％的HOSESTAFF和64.7％的教师首选纸质记录中的EHR。虽然众所周心的员工和ehr的教师验收很高，但HouseStaff表现出比教师更高的批准额定值。接受EHR的核心是保护医师的时间，包括提高系统速度，减少等待计算机的时间变得可用，并尽量减少花费记录的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号