• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>UITP World Congress >Why does public transport need public funding? Recommendations from a UITP survey on the costs and revenue structures of public transport operators
【24h】

Why does public transport need public funding? Recommendations from a UITP survey on the costs and revenue structures of public transport operators

机译：为什么公共交通需要公共资金？ UITP关于公共交通运营商成本和收入结构的建议

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The survey was developed with the goal of allowing exploration of the structure of costs and revenues of public transport operators, trying to understand what factors mostly contribute to its economic performance. The methodology is based on a benchmarking exercise where it was intended to have the participation of around 20 companies from all continents. For reasons of comparability, preference was given to operators dealing exclusively or predominantly with busses. Time and cost constraints imposed that all exchange of information be done via e-mail exchange. Full confidentiality was assured to respondents. Participation was rather low, with only nine responses, most of which partial. Of these nine respondents seven were from Western Europe, one from Brazil and one from China. Still, careful analysis of the data collected allows results to appear. To ensure confidentiality, and reduce risks of bias from different economic situations of the countries, only ratios of original variables are covered. These ratios are then analysed in two dimensions: which level of diversity does each ratio present - a greater variability indicating that there is room for management decisions (in one of the variables involved in the ratio) with significant impact on results; with associations of levels (high / medium / low) between those ratios can be established across the sample - a stable association between two ratios at their corresponding levels suggesting that, either from physical or cultural factors, one entails the other. To avoid the risk of hasty conclusions based on such a small sample, these relations were then put forward for discussion with representatives of international groups active in PT in several continents, who could assess each result of the analysis as being confirmed or at odds with their own experience. The paper presents the main conclusions of this exercise and suggests that they are interesting enough to make the case for a new effort in a similar direction, with better preparation of the process of engagement of participating companies.
机译：这项调查是在允许的成本和公共交通运营商的收入结构的探索的目标发展，试图了解的因素主要是促进其经济表现。该方法是基于基准测试它的目的是有大约20家公司来自各大洲的参与。为了比较的原因，偏好是给专门或主要处理公共汽车运营商。时间和成本的限制规定，信息交换都通过电子邮件交换来完成。完全保密才放心的受访者。参与率相当低，只有9项答复，其中大部分偏的。这九名受访者中七人来自西欧，一名来自巴西，一名来自中国。尽管如此，所收集的数据进行仔细分析可以让结果出现。为了确保机密性，并减少来自不同国家的经济状况偏差的风险，只有原始变量的比率都包括在内。然后这些比例进行分析在两个维度：其中水平的多样性的，它逐一比本 - 一个更大的可变性，表明有必要提供一种管理决策（在所涉及的比率的变量之一）对结果显著影响;与那些比之间的水平（高/中/低）的关联可以在样品被建立 - 在它们的对应的电平的两个比率间的稳定的缔合表明从物理或文化因素，或者说，一个需要另一个。为了避免基于这样一个小样本草率结论的风险，这些关系随后提出了讨论，在几个大洲的PT积极的国际团体的代表，谁可以在分析的每个结果评估为被证实或有胜算的自己的经验。本文介绍了这项工作的主要结论和建议，他们是足够有趣的情况下作出了新的努力以类似的方向，以更好的准备参与公司的啮合过程中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号