• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference of the International Association for Management of Technology >INNOVATION SURVEYS: A PROPOSAL FOR COMPLEMENTARY INDICATORS AT THE FIRM-LEVEL
【24h】

INNOVATION SURVEYS: A PROPOSAL FOR COMPLEMENTARY INDICATORS AT THE FIRM-LEVEL

机译：创新调查：公司级别互补指标的提案

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Academic institutions, governmental agencies, independent organizations, and consulting firms have given continuous and growing attention to the data gathering, analysis, and dissemination of information on the innovative capacity of firms. Increasing the empirical knowledge about the innovative capacity of firms and its determinants can lead to more effective public policies aiming to enhance R&D intensity, innovation performance, and the use of new technologies and business models. In recent years, several studies have attempted to overcome the need to measure innovative capability, highlighting processes, and practices involved in it instead of resources (inputs) or new products or processes (outputs). From this perspective, the objective of this paper is to propose complementary indicators for the existing innovation surveys, focusing on the nature and relevance of innovation management activities at the firm-level rather than estimating R&D and innovation productivity (input versus output). The research methodology encompasses: (i) literature review on measurement of innovation (macro and firm-level); (ii) documentary review covering normative references and existing innovation surveys at national and regional levels; (iii) selection and clustering of innovation indicators at micro-level; (iv) development of a categorized analytical grid and its correspondence to existing indicators used in surveys such as the Community Innovation Survey (CIS); and the Brazilian Innovation Survey (PINTEC); and (v) discussion of main results and formulation of conclusions and recommendations. In addition to providing a rationale that could be a reference for future studies on this subject, we propose five relevant categories of innovation indicators at the firm-level that are not included in the mentioned surveys.
机译：学术机构，政府机构，独立组织和咨询公司对数据收集，分析和传播信息的创新能力提供了持续和越来越关注。增加了对企业创新能力的实证知识及其决定因素可以导致更有效的公共政策，旨在提高研发强度，创新性能以及新技术和商业模式的使用。近年来，几项研究试图克服衡量IT而不是资源（投入）或新产品或进程（产出）所涉及的创新能力，突出显示过程和实践的必要性。从这个角度来看，本文的目的是提出了现有的创新调查的互补指标，重点是创新管理活动对公司水平的自然和相关性，而不是估计研发和创新生产力（输入与产出）。研究方法包括：（i）关于衡量创新的文献综述（宏和公司级别）; （ii）纪录片审查涵盖国家和区域一级的规范参考和现有的创新调查; （iii）在微级选择和聚类创新指标; （iv）开发分类的分析网格及其对调查中使用的现有指标的对应，例如社区创新调查（CIS）;和巴西创新调查（PINTEC）; （v）讨论主要结果和结论和建议的制定。除了提供可能是对该主题的未来研究的参考的理由之外，我们还提出了五大相关类别的创新指标，并在上述调查中不包含。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号