• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>CIRP Life Cycle Engineering Conference >Lessons Learned from Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of Two Residential Towers at the University of British Columbia
【24h】

Lessons Learned from Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of Two Residential Towers at the University of British Columbia

机译：从不列颠哥伦比亚省大学的两栋住宅塔的生命周期评估和生命周期成本中汲取的经验教训

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The University of British Columbia has an interest in incorporating life cycle environmental impacts and financial information into project planning, as well as research and teaching. As part of a tall wood building research program with the UBC Sustainability Initiative and Dept. of Civil Engineering, a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) study was done of two student high-rise residential buildings, based on the result of whole building LCA done by Athena Sustainable Materials Institute and whole building LCC done by Sensible Building Science. These buildings are of similar design but Brock Commons Tallwood House has a hybrid mass-timber structure and Ponderosa Commons Cedar House has a more traditional concrete structure. This paper will include a brief overview of the research process, data collection, analysis, and key results. The paper will then focus on the main opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned from both the results of the LCA/LCC projects and the process of conducting the study.
机译：不列颠哥伦比亚省大学对项目规划以及研究和教学融入了生命周期环境影响和财务信息的兴趣。作为具有UBC可持续发展倡议和土木工程部的高层木材建筑研究计划的一部分，综合生命周期评估（LCA）和生命周期成本（LCC）研究是为两个学生的高层住宅建筑完成的，基于整体建筑LCA的结果由Athena可持续材料研究所和整个建筑物LCC由明智的建筑科学完成。这些建筑物具有类似的设计，但Brock Commons Tallwood House拥有混合大气结构，Ponderosa Commons Cedar House拥有更传统的混凝土结构。本文将包括简要概述研究过程，数据收集，分析和关键结果。然后，本文将专注于从LCA / LCC项目的结果和进行研究的过程中汲取的主要机会，挑战和经验教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号