• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>World Gas Conference >A NEW COMPUTER BASED-APPLICATION FOR OPTIMIZATION OF SEMI-QUANTITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INTEGRITY RISKS IN NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS BASED ON IMPROVED METHODOLOGIES
【24h】

A NEW COMPUTER BASED-APPLICATION FOR OPTIMIZATION OF SEMI-QUANTITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INTEGRITY RISKS IN NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS BASED ON IMPROVED METHODOLOGIES

机译：一种基于新的计算机基于改进方法的天然气传输系统完整性和定量评估的优化应用

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The pillar foundation for process safety in the natural gas industry field, is, what for years now, we refer to, as pipeline integrity management. Pipeline integrity management has subsequently; its pillar foundation, on what for years now, we refer to as risk assessment. Risk assessment is performed, to prevent and control events that may have the potential to end in an uncontrolled gas liberation, which in turn, may cause catastrophic outcome and impact. Although many countries have written regulation and standards in regards to pipeline integrity management of natural gas transmission line systems, such regulation, does not offer specific guidelines. More than two professionals in this area of expertise may agree that, such regulation does not have detailed guidelines, nor, does it exist, under common referenced background related to risk assessment modeling and methodology. The more opinionated professionals may even state for a fact, that focus put on risk management, differs greatly, between companies and may also add, that in many cases the methodology used, does not result in any relevant information, nor does the methodology seem to be practical for its usage. Failure to have detailed guidelines and a well referenced background, about risk assessment for pipeline systems, is one of the causes why, pipeline integrity management systems are not successful and also why, risk assessment in some cases, sticks only to ink printed on paper and doesn't go any further down the leadership's lines of actions, such as well-informed decision making and implementation. The reality for many leaders in the industry is that this tool does not provide all the data for the strategic decision making needed, does not provide all the data to guarantee infrastructure integrity, nor does it provide for the sustainability of the business. During the last seven years, Promigas, a company that operates a natural gas transmission system in Colombia, South America, has been making continuous efforts to make the traditional risk assessment methodology suitable to its needs. To improve the traditional risk assessment methodology, Promigas has adapted, with the existing standards, with the industry's best practices, with the evolutionary nature of its infrastructure, and with the experience of its human resource in the pipeline integrity risk management.
机译：天然气工业领域的工艺安全支柱基础是，多年来，我们参考，作为管道完整性管理。管道完整性管理随后;它的柱子基金会现在多年来，我们称为风险评估。进行风险评估，以防止和控制可能有可能在不受控制的气体解放中结束的事件，这反过来可能导致灾难性的结果和影响。虽然许多国家对天然气传输线系统的管道完整性管理有书面规范和标准，但这些规定不提供具体指导。这一领域的两位专业人士可能会同意，在与风险评估建模和方法相关的常见引用背景下，这种规则也没有必要的指导原则。更具各种专业人士甚至可能出于一个事实，焦点投入风险管理，在公司之间具有很大的不同之处在于，在许多情况下，在许多情况下使用的方法，不会导致任何相关信息，也没有方法论似乎也没有为其使用实用。未能有详细的指导方针和引用的背景，关于管道系统的风险评估，是原因原因，管道完整性管理系统不成功，而且还为什么，风险评估在某些情况下，仅粘在纸上印刷的墨水和不会进一步下来领导地位的行动行，如知情的决策和实施。业内许多领导者的现实是，该工具没有提供所需的战略决策的所有数据，不提供保证基础设施完整性的所有数据，也不提供业务的可持续性。在过去的七年期间，南美洲哥伦比亚哥伦比亚经营天然气传输系统的促销活动一直在努力，使其适合其需求的传统风险评估方法。为了提高传统风险评估方法，Promigas与现有标准进行了适应，与业界最佳实践，其基础设施的进化性质，以及其人力资源在管道诚信风险管理中的经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号