• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics >An Uncertainty Principle for Interdependence: Laying the Theoretical Groundwork for Human-Machine Teams
【24h】

An Uncertainty Principle for Interdependence: Laying the Theoretical Groundwork for Human-Machine Teams

机译：相互依存的不确定性原则：为人工团队奠定理论基础

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The deliberateness of rational decision-making is an attempt by social scientists to improve on intuition. Rational approaches using Shannon's information theory have argued that teams and organizations should minimize interdependence (mutual information); social psychologists have long recommended the removal of the effects of interdependence to make their data iid (independent, non-orthogonal, memoryless); and the social science of interdependence is disappearing. But according to experimental evidence reported by the National Academy of Sciences, the best teams maximize interdependence. Thus, navigating social reality has so far permitted only an intuitive approach to social and psychological interdependence. Absent from these conflicting paradigms is the foundation for a theory of teams that combines rationality and interdependence based on first principles which we have begun to sketch philosophically and mathematically. Without a rational mathematics of interdependence, building human-machine teams in the future will remain intuitive, based on guesswork, and inefficient.
机译：理性决策的谨慎是社会科学家的尝试，以改善直觉。使用Shannon信息理论的合理方法据称，团队和组织应尽量减少相互依存（相互信息）;社会心理学家长期推荐删除相互依存的影响，使其数据IID（独立，非正交，记忆）;和相互依存的社会科学正在消失。但根据国家科学院报道的实验证据，最好的球队最大化相互依存。因此，到目前为止，驾驶社会现实只允许一个直观的社会和心理相互依存。从这些冲突的范式中缺席是一支基于第一个原则的团队理论的基础，这是我们已经开始绘画哲学和数学的第一个原则的合理性和相互依存。如果没有合理的相互依存数学，将来建立人工机组队伍将基于猜测和效率低下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号