• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Simulation Interoperability Workshop >Standardizing Battle Management Language - A Vital Move Towards the Army Transformation
【24h】

Standardizing Battle Management Language - A Vital Move Towards the Army Transformation

机译：标准化战斗管理语言 - 对陆军转型的重要举动

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In recent years there has been a move towards digitizing military Command and Control (C2) systems and communicating not only with other humans, but also with automated systems. Most recently, there has been a need to use simulations to stimulate and be stimulated by the Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) systems. Communication between C4I systems and Simulations is becoming less interpersonal and more data oriented. As each new system is developed to be more differentiated and specialized, the result is a confusion of new "languages" and an overall reduction in the ability to effectively communicate C2 information. What is needed is a standardized Battle Management Language (BML). The Army has established a Simulation to C4I Interoperability Overarching Integrated Product Team (SIMCI OIPT) to identify and work on key interoperability issues. BML has been identified to the SIMCI OIPT as not only an essential simulation issue, but also an important C4I issue. The most critical C2 information, the commander's intent, his orders and directives, does not currently flow as data. Instead, it is communicated as "free text" elements within messages or as stand-alone files. While suitable for interpersonal communication, it is inadequate for use with simulations, or as we have shown, for future forces that have robotic components. This paper examines the fundamental problem of communicating C2 information unambiguously. We briefly review the major efforts to solve the BML problem and explain why they are insufficient for solving the large-scale problem. Our approach to develop a BML is to adapt representations of orders and directives (such as the operations order) so that they are directly derived from doctrine and reside within the current standardized C4I data models like the Joint Common Data Base (JCDB). This accomplishes two primary goals. First, it provides for a means to link the BML (terminology and symbology) directly to their doctrinal source. Second, it allows operational forces to use their C4I systems to 1) interact with supporting simulations to conduct rigorous, realistic training and support mission rehearsals; and 2) in the future, support an expedited military decision making process. A BML properly designed and implemented will allow Army forces to not only "train as they fight" but also transition to the Objective Force and the Future Combat Systems.
机译：近年来，朝着数字化军事指挥和控制（C2）系统并不仅与其他人类进行通信，还致力于自动化系统。最近，有需要使用模拟来刺激并受到指挥，控制，通信，计算机和智能（C4i）系统的刺激。 C4I系统与模拟之间的通信变得越来越缺乏人际关系和更多的数据。随着每个新系统都被开发为更差异化和专业化，结果是新的“语言”的混乱，并且能够有效地传达C2信息的能力的整体减少。所需要的是标准化的战斗管理语言（BML）。陆军建立了对C4I互操作性的模拟，总体综合产品团队（SIMCI OIPT）识别和研究关键互操作性问题。 BML已被确定为SIMCI OIPT，不仅是一个重要的模拟问题，也是一个重要的C4i问题。最关键的C2信息，指挥官的意图，他的订单和指令目前尚未作为数据流。相反，它被称为消息中的“自由文本”元素或作为独立文件。虽然适用于人际关系通信，但与模拟使用不充分，或者我们所示，对于具有机器人组件的未来力量。本文审查了明确宣传C2信息的根本问题。我们简要介绍解决BML问题的重大努力，并解释为什么他们不足以解决大规模问题。我们开发BML的方法是调整订单和指令（例如运营顺序）的表示，以便它们直接从学说中得出，并驻留在当前标准化的C4i数据模型中，如联合公共数据库（JCDB）。这完成了两个主要目标。首先，它提供了一种方法，以便将BML（术语和符号）直接链接到其教义来源。其次，它允许运营力使用他们的C4i系统到1）与支持模拟进行互动，以进行严格，现实的培训和支持特派团排练; 2）在未来，支持加快军事决策过程。适当设计和实施的BML将使军队不仅要“在战斗中培训”，而且还致力于客观部队和未来的战斗系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号