首页> 外文会议>Pipeline Division Specialty Conference >Permitting Issues versus Integrity Management
【24h】

Permitting Issues versus Integrity Management

机译:允许问题与完整性管理

获取原文

摘要

The U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) administers the pipeline safety regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically 49 CFR Part 192 for the natural gas industry and Part 195 for the petroleum industry. In response to the severity of leaks and collateral damages incurred on an aging infrastructure in recent years, the U.S. Department of Justice and OPS have enacted stricter regulatory enforcement and new integrity management programs for each industry. Industry response and compliance definition have been diverse: Part 195 defines a high-consequence area (HCA) to include commercially navigable waterways, high population areas, other populated areas and unusually environmentally sensitive areas; this places most of the northeastern United States in the HCA classification for petroleum pipelines. The natural gas industry, as regulated by Part 192, defines an HCA based on the area classification and the potential-impact radius of a worst-case incident. These differences have resulted in two distinct approaches to obtaining and maintaining compliance. In addition, total repair costs and permitting requirements vary widely across the United States, and the time necessary to acquire permits in the Northeast can easily exceed the 60-day or 180-day time limits under Part 195, with some agencies having no emergency permit process. To offset these critical issues, the integrity management program should incorporate the permitting lead times into the repair plans, and repair site access plans for equipment and materials should allow for requirements imposed by the permitting agencies as a condition of issuing the permit. This paper identifies environmental permitting requirements relative to pipeline facilities and describes key steps that can be taken to avoid compliance conflicts among regulatory agencies. Also, environmental permitting issues and requirements to minimize the impacts on pipeline repair plans that cause compliance conflicts with the pipeline safety regulations are discussed.
机译:美国管家局部门安全部(OPS)负责人在联邦法规守则中管理管道安全规定,特别是49 CFR第192份为天然气工业和第195部分为石油工业。近年来,在近年来近年来衰老基础设施泄漏和抵押损害的严重程度,美国司法部和行动部制定了对每个行业的更严格的监管执法和新的完整性管理方案。行业响应和合规性定义已经多样化:第195部分定义了高度后果区域(HCA),以包括商业通航的水路,高人口区域,其他人口稠密的地区和异常环保区域;这将在美国东北部大部分地区占石油管道的HCA分类。由第192部分调节的天然气工业限定了基于面积分类的HCA和最坏情况事件的潜在影响半径。这些差异导致了两种不同的方法来获得和维持合规性。此外,在美国的全部维修费用和允许的要求中差异很大,并且在东北地区获得许可所需的时间可以很容易超过第195部分下的60天或180天的时间限制,其中一些机构没有紧急许可过程。为了抵消这些关键问题,完整性管理计划应将允许的交付时间纳入维修计划,修复设备和材料的访问计划应允许允许机构作为发布许可证的条件来征收的要求。本文识别相对于管道设施的环境允许的要求,并描述了可以采取的关键步骤,以避免监管机构之间的遵守冲突。此外,讨论了环境允许的问题和要求,以最大限度地减少对管道修复计划的影响,导致与管道安全法规的遵守冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号