首页> 外文会议>Information Management Technology and Customer Service Conference Exposition >Water Utility Efficiency Measurement and Comparison Using a Data Envelopment Analysis Procedure: Role of Water Source and Ownership Type
【24h】

Water Utility Efficiency Measurement and Comparison Using a Data Envelopment Analysis Procedure: Role of Water Source and Ownership Type

机译:使用数据包络分析程序的水实用效率测量和比较:水源和所有权类型的作用

获取原文

摘要

This paper employs data envelopment analysis (DEA) of US EPA Community Water System Survey data (EPA, 2002) to compare the relative efficiencies of facility ownership type and nature of water source for potable water utilities. Three ownership types (private for-profit, private not-for-profit, and public) and two types of supply sources (ground and surface water sources) are compared. Statistically significant results indicating the efficiency advantage of certain utility types depending on measurement variable selection were found, and clear trends towards certain utility types were identified, notwithstanding the variable selections used for measurement. The findings indicate that public utilities are most efficient overall, followed by private not-for-profit utilities, with private for profit utilities being least efficient. Except for a few cases of very large supply demands, utilities employing ground water sources were generally more efficient than those using surface water sources. A brief investigation into the marginal return on information obtained from using additional measurement variables to measure utility performance is also presented. It is demonstrated that additional ranking information can be obtained by using more discrete measurement variables, but that there are diminishing marginal returns. This efficiency evaluation of public water utilities should prove useful as a tool for guiding ownership policy and water source development.
机译:本文采用美国EPA社区水系统调查数据(EPA,2002)的数据包络分析(DEA),以比较饮用水公用事业的设施所有权类型和水源性质的相对效率。比较了三种所有权(私人营利,私人非营利性,公共)和两种类型的供应源(地面和地表水源)。指示根据测量变量选择某些实用程序类型的效率优点统计学显著结果发现,和对某些类型的效用明显的趋势被确定,尽管用于测量的变量的选择。调查结果表明,公用事业总体最有效,其次是私人非营利性公用事业,私人利润公用事业最低效率。除了一些非常大的供需需求情况外,采用地面水源的公用事业通常比使用地表水源更有效。还提出了对使用额外的测量变量来测量实用程序性能获得的边际返回的简要调查。据证明,可以通过使用更多离散的测量变量来获得额外的排名信息,但是有边缘返回递减减少。公共水公用事业的这种效率评估应作为指导所有权政策和水源发展的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号