首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference Exposition >ENGINEERING DESIGN: ARE WE TEACHING THE RIGHT STUFF?
【24h】

ENGINEERING DESIGN: ARE WE TEACHING THE RIGHT STUFF?

机译:工程设计:我们是否教授正确的东西?

获取原文

摘要

Developing an undergraduate engineering design curriculum can be a challenge. Using the continuous improvement process adopted by ABET 2000, engineering programs typically consider: which outcomes our program should set out to achieve, which assessment measures to use, and how we should make revisions to develop our program. To achieve the "outcomes" program faculty carefully develop curricula including what should be taught, and also when and how it should be taught. This study reviewed literature, beginning with 1991, covering capstone design and design education in general. The composition of respondents varies such as group surveys covering capstone design among different disciplines and other, more narrowly focused surveys. In summary the studies indicate that since Dixon's seminal article in 1991 we have seen: increased emphasis in integrating the Product Realization Process, improvement in the working definitions of design and design processes, an increase in the number of design topics taught in capstone design from 1994 to 2005, but, an apparent and dramatic decrease in the number of design topics from 2003-2006.
机译:发展本科工程设计课程可能是一个挑战。使用ABET 2000采用的持续改进过程,工程方案通常会考虑:我们的计划应列出的结果,以实现,评估使用的评估措施以及我们应该如何制定修订我们的计划。为了达到“结果”计划,仔细开发课程,包括应该教授的内容,以及何时以及如何教授。这项研究从1991年开始审查了文献,涵盖了Capstone设计和设计教育。受访者的组成在不同学科和其他更狭窄的调查中覆盖绞盘设计的组调查。总之,研究表明,由于迪克森在1991年的一篇文章中,我们已经看到:增加重点在于整合产品实现过程,改进了设计和设计过程的工作定义,从1994年开始的设计主题的数量增加到2005年,但是,2003 - 2006年的设计主题数目明显和戏剧性地减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号