首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Information Security and Cyber Forensics >Cyber Defamation: A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Position in Malaysia and the United Kingdom~1
【24h】

Cyber Defamation: A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Position in Malaysia and the United Kingdom~1

机译:网络诽谤:马来西亚与英国法律地位的比较分析〜1

获取原文

摘要

The phenomenal explosion of the information and communication technology (ICT) has brought great changes to our daily lives. And with the advent of numerous kinds of Internet communications such as electronic mails (e-mails), chat groups, online fora, web logs (blogs), social media platforms and many others, Internet users are able to easily publish and disseminate any kind of information to the public at large. Unfortunately, the ease of use of these online media has on several occasions been misused by unscrupulous individuals for publishing defamatory remarks in the cyber world. At present, reported cases of cyber defamation have been on the rise in Malaysia. In relation thereof, the paper embarks on a doctrinal study to examine the efficacy of the existing regulatory regime that governs such a crime. In so doing, the study will analyse the provisions of the Malaysian Defamation Act 1957 (the primary source of law for defamation) and relevant reported cases that have been decided by the Malaysian judiciary. Apart from that, a comparative analysis with the position in the United Kingdom after the enactment of the English Defamation Act 2013 will be made since the Malaysian statute was drafted far back in the 1950s and since then no significant amendment was made to reflect the advancement of the Information Age. Finally, this paper will attempt to highlight any loopholes or lacunae in the existing laws and possible suggestions and recommendation as part of its conclusion.
机译:信息和通信技术(ICT)的现象爆炸为我们的日常生活带来了巨大的变化。随着众多互联网通信的出现,如电子邮件(电子邮件),聊天组,在线雕像,网络日志(博客),社交媒体平台和许多其他人,互联网用户能够轻松发布和传播任何类型向公众大的信息。遗憾的是,这些在线媒体的易用性有多次因肆无忌惮的个人而滥用在网络世界中发表诽谤言论的令人沮丧的人。目前,报道的网络诽谤案件已经升高了马来西亚。在其相关的情况下,论文开始了一个教义研究,以检查治理这种犯罪的现行监管制度的功效。在此目的,该研究将分析1957年马来西亚诽谤法的规定(诽谤的主要法律来源)以及马来西亚司法机构决定的相关案件。除此之外,自2015年第2010年起草的英国诽谤法案后,将在颁布英国诽谤法案后的比较分析,以来,自20世纪50年代遥远,从那时起,没有重大修正案反映了反映了促进的信息时代。最后,本文将试图在现行法律和可能的建议和建议中突出任何漏洞或拉布纳,作为其结论的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号