首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Education, Economics, Social Science, Arts, Sports and Management Engineering >A Comparison Study of Two Testing Approaches in Formative Assessment in English Majors Listening Teaching
【24h】

A Comparison Study of Two Testing Approaches in Formative Assessment in English Majors Listening Teaching

机译:英国专业听力教学中两种测试方法的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

With the popularity of computers and the appearance of the Internet, researches about the application of formative assessment in English teaching under the Internet environment is increasing. The experiment of this paper taken on the basis of Formative Assessment in classroom English teaching and the principles of online formative assessment is to see whether there are any significant differences between these two different ways of testing in improving students' listening comprehension ability. The result shows that there is a feasibility of online-based testing methods in formative assessment, like the traditional paper-based testing in formative assessment, but there are no significant differences between these two methods. Some reasons are discussed including test frequency, the influence of answering webpages and students' mental state, and the experiment lasting periods, etc. However, students are all in favor of online-based testing and hope it will be continuing used in the English teaching and learning. Limitation of this study is discussed and some suggestions about online-based testing in formative assessment for further research are provided by the author.
机译:随着计算机的普及和互联网的外观,关于在互联网环境下在英语教学中应用形成性评估的研究正在增加。本文在课堂上英语教学中的形成性评估的基础上进行了实验,并在线形成性评估的原则是看这两种不同的测试方面是否存在显着差异,从而提高学生的听力理解能力。结果表明,在形成性评估中存在基于在线的测试方法的可行性,如形成性评估中的传统纸质测试,但这两种方法之间没有显着差异。讨论了一些原因,包括测试频率,回答网页和学生的精神状态的影响以及实验持续期间等,学生都赞成基于网上的测试,并希望它将继续在英语教学中使用和学习。讨论了本研究的限制,提交人提供了对进一步研究的形成性评估中基于在线测试的一些建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号