首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Universal Design >How Juries Assess Universal Design in Norwegian Architectural School Competitions
【24h】

How Juries Assess Universal Design in Norwegian Architectural School Competitions

机译:德国如何评估挪威建筑学校比赛的普遍设计

获取原文

摘要

This paper investigates how architectural school competition juries assess Universal Design. The method used is a case study of 18 recent architectural school competitions in Norway. The results show that most competition briefs ask for Universal Designed buildings. In 8 of the 18 cases, Universal Design is mentioned as an assessment criterion. In 11 of the 18 cases, Universal Design is commented on by the juries in the jury reports, but only in 3 of the cases, do the juries assess this aspect consistently on every competition project. The overall impression is that some amount of uncertainty looms concerning how Universal Design should be assessed in the competition stage. Based on the findings, future juries should concentrate on orientation and overview prior to technicalities and details.
机译:本文调查了架构学校竞争陪审团如何评估普遍设计。使用的方法是挪威最近建筑学校比赛的案例研究。结果表明,大多数竞争简报要求普遍设计的建筑物。在18例中的8例中,将提到通用设计作为评估标准。在18例中的11例中,普遍设计由陪审团报告中的陪审团评论,但仅在3个案件中,陪审团仅在每个竞争项目方面始终如一地评估这一方面。整体印象是如何在竞争阶段评估如何评估普遍设计的一些不确定性织机。根据调查结果,未来的陪审团应在技术和细节之前专注于定位和概述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号