【24h】

The Politics of Gender in Indonesia's Political Parties

机译:印度尼西亚政党的性别政治

获取原文

摘要

After the 1998 political reforms, political parties had been encouraged to practice gender politics, oriented to have equality by providing lots of affirmative spaces for women's involvement as the demand for political parties is more inclusive to women to take apart and carry cooperative programs for women improvement. Based on Law No. 17 of 2017 concerning general elections with a minimum quota of 30% must be female, there is a space for positive affirmation of gender politics in Indonesia's electoral democracy. This paper scrutinizes the basic foundations and practices of political parties in conducting gender politics through two things, namely the role of women in the power structure and the women's empowerment program. The Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) as Nationalist Ideology and Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) as Modernist Islam in the regional level, in Malang City, are as a case study. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method in which primary data collection techniques were conducted through observation and structured interviews, whereas documentation and library techniques collected secondary data. The results reveal that PDIP and PKS, in Malang City, have differences when practising gender politics in which PDIP is more inclusive based on competence and social networks but weak on women's empowerment programs and having a small number of female cadres whilst on the other hand, although it is still attached to patriarchal culture so that women are tough to reach the highest positions, PKS has many core female cadres and produces integrated programs to empower women.
机译:在1998年的政治改革之后,鼓励政党练习性别政治,以对妇女参与的大量肯定空间提供平等,因为政党的需求更加包容,妇女拆除并携带合作妇女改善。基于2017年第17号法律关于一般选举的最低选举必须是女性,在印度尼西亚选举民主中,存在对性别政治的积极肯定的空间。本文通过两件事审查了政党在执行性别政治方面的基本基础和实践,即妇女在权力结构和妇女赋权计划中的作用。印度尼西亚民主党的斗争(PDIP)作为民族主义思想和繁荣的司法党(PKS)作为地区一级的现代主义伊斯兰教,在玛琅市,是一个案例研究。该研究使用了一种描述性定性方法,其中通过观察和结构化访谈进行了主要数据收集技术,而文档和图书馆技术则收集了次要数据。结果表明,在迈尔琅城的PDIP和PKS在练习性别政治时具有差异,其中PDIP基于能力和社交网络更具包容性,但妇女的赋权计划薄弱,另一方面有少数女性干部,虽然它仍然附加到父权制文化,使女性难以达到最高职位,但PKS有许多核心女性干部,并产生赋予妇女的综合计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号