• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on English Language and Teaching >THE QUALITY OF STUDENTS' PARAPHRASES OF AN EXPOSITORY TEXT: A Study of 15 English Department Students of State University of Padang
【24h】

THE QUALITY OF STUDENTS' PARAPHRASES OF AN EXPOSITORY TEXT: A Study of 15 English Department Students of State University of Padang

机译：学生的含量释义的展示文本：州立大学15名英语科学学生的研究

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The article was based on a research aimed at obtaining the information related to students' quality in paraphrasing an expository text seen from the four dimensions of a paraphrase evaluation. The subjects of the research were 15 students who had passed all reading and writing courses. The instrument used in the research was paraphrasing test. The components which were used as the base to evaluate students' work were semantic completeness, lexical similarity, syntactic similarity and paraphrase quality. The students' works were graded by scoring rubric which was divided into 4 categories; 4 meant excellent, 3 meant satisfactory, 2 meant below average and I meant ineffective. The research findings showed that students' paraphrase quality was on ineffective category since almost all of the students obtained 1 on all dimensions. On semantic completeness dimension, almost all students obtained 1 which meant they were on ineffective category. On lexical completeness dimension, almost all students obtained 1 which also meant they were on ineffective category. Also, on the rest dimensions; syntactical and paraphrase quality dimensions, almost all of them obtained 1, which indicated that they were on ineffective category. It was expected that more concerns related students' paraphrase should be given.
机译：本文基于一项研究，该研究旨在获得与学生质量相关的信息，以解释从释义评估的四个维度看到的展示文本。研究的主题是15名学生通过所有阅读和写作课程。该研究中使用的仪器是可解释的测试。用作评估学生的基础的组件是语义完整性，词汇相似性，句法相似性和解释质量。学生的作品被评分规划分为4个类别; 4意味着优异，3个意味着令人满意，2平均值低于平均值，我的意思是无效。研究结果表明，学生的释义质量是无效的类别，因为几乎所有的学生都在所有维度上获得了1。关于语义完整性维度，几乎所有学生都达到了一个意味着它们是无效的类别。在词汇完整性维度上，几乎所有学生都可以获得，这也意味着他们是无效的类别。此外，在静止尺寸上;句法和解释质量尺寸，几乎所有的尺寸都获得了1，这表明它们是无效的类别。预计应给予更多疑虑相关学生的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号