• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>People transforming information – information transforming people >Institutional repositories as portents of change: Disruption or reassembly? Conjectures and reconfigurations
【24h】

Institutional repositories as portents of change: Disruption or reassembly? Conjectures and reconfigurations

机译：机构存储库是变化的预兆：破坏还是重组？猜想和重新配置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper reviews how Open Access policies (OA) and Institutional Repositories (IR) might bernportrayed as agents of change within the realm of scholarly publishing. Using commentary onrnacademic publishing as background, commentary that sees OA and IR as optimal andrninevitable, and beneficially disruptive of the existing system, two theoretical approaches arernpresented as ways of providing a more detailed and explicit analysis of OA/IR dynamics. Bothrntheories to varying degrees derive their inspiration from an exploration of the nature ofrnchange. The first "disruptive technology/disruptive innovation" approach (Christensen)rnspecifies change in market theory terms, a re-structuring "driven" by innovation within, andrnpossibly disruptive of, existing market arrangements. The second approach views change as arnprocess of "reassembling" and reconfiguring of relationships between elements of a networkrn(Actor-Network Theory). The application of both approaches to OA/IR is explored, includingrnreference to a case study on a university institutional repository implementation. Whilern"disruption" and similar terms might be in common and casual use, the basic idea gainsrngreater clarity in these theories, and in doing so promotes greater awareness of thernassumptions being made, and the aspirations being pursued.
机译：本文回顾了如何将开放访问策略（OA）和机构存储库（IR）描绘成学术出版领域中的变革推动者。以评论性的学术出版为背景，评论认为OA和IR是最佳且不可避免的，并且有利地破坏了现有系统，提出了两种理论方法作为对OA / IR动态进行更详细和明确分析的方法。两种理论在不同程度上都源于对变革本质的探索。第一种“破坏性技术/破坏性创新”方法（Christensen）指定了市场理论术语的变化，这种结构是由内部市场中的创新“驱动”的重组，并且可能破坏现有的市场安排。第二种方法将变化视为“重新组装”和重新配置网络元素之间的关系的学习过程（Actor-Network Theory）。探索了两种方法在OA / IR中的应用，包括对大学机构知识库实施的案例研究的参考。尽管“破坏”和类似术语可能经常使用，但基本思想在这些理论中变得更加清晰，从而使人们更加认识到正在做出的假设和追求的愿望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号