首页> 外文学位 >With sadness comes accuracy, with happiness, false memory: Affect influences processing styles.
【24h】

With sadness comes accuracy, with happiness, false memory: Affect influences processing styles.

机译:悲伤带来准确性,快乐带来虚假记忆:情感影响处理方式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation sought to examine whether affective states influence how we learn and remember events we have experienced. Everyday experiences involve a constant interplay of perception and memory. For instance, Hunt and Einstein (1981) argue that encoding items can take two forms, item-specific and relational processing. An item-specific processing approach encodes individual items and their features, whereas a relational processing approach encodes relationships among concepts. In these situations affective cues may serve to switch between relational processing and item-specific processing. Specifically, the affect-as-information hypothesis predicts that individuals experiencing positive affective cues encode items in relation to an accessible cognition, whereas individuals experiencing negative affective cues encode items in an item-specific manner (Clore et al., 2001a). To test this hypothesis, I used a false memory task that depends on relational processing to produce false memories (Roediger, Watson, McDermott, & Gallo, 2001). For all experiments, positive and negative moods were induced prior to learning various word lists. In Experiment 1, I observed that negative moods reduced occurrence of false memories. Experiment 2 manipulated the false memory instructions, and Experiment 3 manipulated the timing of the mood induction. The results of Experiments 2 and 3 provided evidence to suggest that affective states influenced encoding processes, which led to the negative mood groups producing fewer false memories. In Experiment 4, I found direct evidence that affective states influenced processing styles (relational vs. item-specific). I suggest that positive affective states trigger relational processing, whereas negative affective states trigger item-specific processing, thus leading to differences in how information is encoded and remembered.
机译:本文试图研究情感状态是否影响我们学习和记忆经历的事件。每天的经验涉及感知和记忆的不断相互作用。例如,亨特和爱因斯坦(Hunt and Einstein,1981)认为编码项目可以采用两种形式,即项目特定和关系处理。项目特定的处理方法对单个项目及其特征进行编码,而关系处理方法对概念之间的关系进行编码。在这些情况下,情感提示可用于在关系处理和特定项处理之间切换。具体来说,“以信息为依据”的假设预测,经历积极情感线索的个体会根据可访问的认知来编码项目,而经历消极情感线索的个体会以特定于项目的方式对事物进行编码(Clore等人,2001a)。为了检验这个假设,我使用了一个错误记忆任务,该任务依赖于关系处理来产生错误记忆(Roediger,Watson,McDermott和Gallo,2001)。对于所有实验,在学习各种单词列表之前都会诱发积极和消极的情绪。在实验1中,我观察到负面情绪减少了错误记忆的发生。实验2操纵错误的记忆指令,实验3操纵情绪诱导的时间。实验2和3的结果提供了证据,表明情感状态影响了编码过程,从而导致负面情绪群体产生更少的错误记忆。在实验4中,我发现直接的证据表明情感状态会影响处理方式(关系式与项目特定式)。我建议,积极的情感状态会触发关系处理,而消极的情感状态会触发特定项目的处理,从而导致信息编码和记忆方式的差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Storbeck, Justin L.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Psychology Social.;Psychology Cognitive.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 118 p.
  • 总页数 118
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号