首页> 外文学位 >The political economy of community disaster management assets: A case study of the farm community in Sussex County, Delaware.
【24h】

The political economy of community disaster management assets: A case study of the farm community in Sussex County, Delaware.

机译:社区灾难管理资产的政治经济学:以特拉华州苏塞克斯县的农场社区为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study intended to advance research on community disaster management assets and contribute to the current policy development of FEMA's Whole Community concept by investigating those internal and external factors, which are responsible for the activation of community disaster management resources. By example of an ethnographic case study of one community group, namely the farm community in Sussex County, Delaware, a conceptual framework was developed with two distinct components: (1) a community-internal micro filter consisting of a credibility and capacity test; and (2) a macro filter that examined government and other exogenous influences, which encourage or inhibit the activation of resources. Four major themes emerged from the data analysis: (1) the role of different types of community capital, which highlighted human, social and political capital as bonding and bridging capitals for the Sussex County farm community; (2) a divergent understanding of the political economy of disaster management assets by the institutionalized emergency management system and the local community as a major challenge to engage the community; (3) the distinctiveness of community disaster management assets as opposed to other types of community assets, particularly with regard to the expeditiousness of supply of resources critical in disaster management; and (4) the effective use of disaster management resources, which questions the long-term sustainability of an intervention. The latter suggested integrating a third component of a sustainability assessment into the conceptual framework to analyze the long-term effects of the exchange of demand and supply of activated resources. Recommendations include, among others, the integration of the various planning processes at the county level, notably comprehensive and disaster planning, in order to establish a common understanding of needs, resources, and longer-term goals among the various community groups; a focus on the levers in the micro and macro filters as possible entry points for community engagement; and a suggestion for individuals and organizations interested in strengthening community disaster management assets to use the proposed conceptual framework to develop and examine community-appropriate interventions.
机译:这项研究旨在通过调查那些负责激活社区灾难管理资源的内部和外部因素,推动对社区灾难管理资产的研究,并为FEMA整个社区概念的当前政策发展做出贡献。通过对一个社区群体(即特拉华州苏塞克斯县的农场社区)的人种学案例研究的示例,开发了一个概念框架,该框架包含两个不同的部分:(1)社区内部的微过滤器,由信誉和能力测试组成; (2)宏过滤器,用于检查政府鼓励和抑制资源激活的其他外部影响。数据分析出现了四个主要主题:(1)不同类型的社区资本的作用,突出了人力,社会和政治资本作为苏塞克斯郡农业社区的纽带和桥梁。 (2)制度化的应急管理系统和当地社区对灾难管理资产的政治经济学有不同的理解,这是使社区参与的主要挑战; (3)与其他类型的社区资产相比,社区灾难管理资产的独特性,特别是在迅速提供对灾难管理至关重要的资源方面; (4)有效利用灾害管理资源,这对干预措施的长期可持续性提出了质疑。后者建议将可持续性评估的第三部分纳入概念框架,以分析需求量和活化资源交换之间的长期影响。建议除其他外包括在县一级整合各种规划程序,特别是综合性和灾难性规划,以便在各个社区群体之间建立对需求,资源和长期目标的共识;着眼于微观和宏观过滤器中的杠杆,作为社区参与的可能切入点;对于有兴趣加强社区灾难管理资产的个人和组织,建议使用拟议的概念框架来开发和检查适合社区的干预措施。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rademacher, Yvonne.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Delaware.;

  • 授予单位 University of Delaware.;
  • 学科 Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 188 p.
  • 总页数 188
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号