• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >'To give or not to give:' Interactions between rural relief clients and social workers during the emergency relief period of the Great Depression, 1933 to 1935.
【24h】

'To give or not to give:' Interactions between rural relief clients and social workers during the emergency relief period of the Great Depression, 1933 to 1935.

机译：“奉献与不奉献：” 1933年至1935年大萧条的紧急救济期间，农村救济客户与社会工作者之间的互动。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

During the Great Depression of the 1930s, millions of Americans suffered from long term unemployment and subsistence poverty while the federal government's New Deal attempted to address the problems of poverty. But the rural poor were affected by a kind of chronic poverty that would prove more difficult to address with government-run relief efforts. Because traditional methods of relief from poverty were embedded in the socioeconomic culture of rural America, it was not always possible to apply the same federal relief methods in the countryside as in the urban areas of the nation. The rural poor stood to benefit from modern social relief services and, for a brief period, it seemed as if those services would become available for their benefit. However, as I argue in this dissertation, economic conservatism hindered the potential effectiveness of the two-year federal emergency relief program.;From 1933 to 1935, the United States federal government backed the unprecedented expenditure of billions of dollars in direct emergency relief. Abiding the advice of prominent social workers, the government created an emergency relief program to address the alarming needs of impoverished Americans. These programs affected those who suffered the effects of long term unemployment and those trapped in rural poverty. The federal government created social welfare policies that had the power to ease the misery of those forced to subsist at the bottom. Government benefits and impoverished beneficiaries met through social work. For a brief span of time, the New Deal emergency relief period of early 1933 to mid-1935 offered an opportunity for social workers to promote a nationalized system of social welfare. This is an understudied aspect of American history, and is the focus of this dissertation..
机译：在1930年代的大萧条时期，数百万的美国人长期失业和生活贫困，而联邦政府的《新政》则试图解决贫困问题。但是农村贫困人口受到一种长期贫困的影响，这种长期贫困事实证明，政府管理的救济工作很难解决。由于传统的脱贫方法已经植入了美国农村的社会经济文化中，因此在农村地区并不总是可以像在美国的城市地区那样采用相同的联邦救济方法。农村贫困人口可以从现代社会救济服务中受益，并且在很短的时间内，似乎这些服务将为他们带来好处。但是，正如我在本文中所论证的那样，经济保守主义阻碍了为期两年的联邦紧急救济计划的潜在效力。从1933年到1935年，美国联邦政府支持了数十亿美元的直接紧急救济方面空前的支出。政府遵循著名社会工作者的建议，制定了一项紧急救济计划，以解决贫困美国人的迫切需求。这些方案影响了那些遭受长期失业影响的人和陷入农村贫困的人。联邦政府制定了社会福利政策，有权减轻那些被迫底层生活的人们的痛苦。通过社会工作满足了政府的利益和贫困的受益人。在短暂的时间内，1933年初至1935年中的新政紧急救济期为社会工作者提供了一个促进国民化社会福利体系的机会。这是美国历史上尚未被研究的方面，也是本文的重点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kisat, Courtney.;

  • 作者单位

    Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.;

  • 授予单位 Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.;
  • 学科 American Studies.;Social Work.;History United States.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 268 p.
  • 总页数 268
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号