• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A grammatical analysis and comparison of three college and university English proficiency entrance examinations used in Taiwan.
【24h】

A grammatical analysis and comparison of three college and university English proficiency entrance examinations used in Taiwan.

机译：台湾使用的三种高等学校英语能力入学考试的语法分析和比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Three different kinds of English proficiency tests, AST, SAT and EEFTC, held for the purpose of selecting students into colleges and universities in Taiwan from 2002 to 2004 were examined in this study. Four research questions are asked in this study.; First, what is the proportional distribution and proportionate emphasis in different grammatical constructions in terms of the four-level grammatical framework in the three batteries of the AST, the SAT and the EEFTC in 2002 to 2004? Second, what are the differences and similarities in terms of the four-level grammatical framework between and among the three batteries in 2002 to 2004? Third, how does the yearly average grammatical complexity level of the AST and the SAT correspond to their designed difficulty level from 2002 to 2004? Does the AST, considered more difficult than the SAT, present a higher yearly average level of grammatical complexity than that of the SAT in 2002 to 2004? Fourth, what is the yearly average grammatical complexity level of the EEFTC when it is compared with the AST and the SAT from 2002 to 2004?{09}Does the EEFTC present a lower grammatical complexity level than the AST and the SAT, which are more difficult than the EEFTC in 2002 to 2004?; To answer these questions, a four-level grammatical framework is developed to generate the statistics regarding the grammatical structure of the three testing batteries at the four levels. Moreover, a hierarchy of grammatical complexity was developed to compare the relative grammatical complexity among and between different tests.; The result of the study shows that in 2002 to 2004, in levels of clause, phrases of noun, preposition and auxiliary verb, and word, AST presents the higher yearly average grammatical complexity.{09}In levels of sentence, phrases of adjective, adverb, and main verb, SAT presents the higher yearly average grammatical complexity. This suggests that a positive correlation between the two tests' difficulty level and their grammatical complexity level exists in the levels of clause, phrases of noun, preposition and auxiliary verb, and word. On the other hand, a negative correlation between the two tests' designed relative difficulty level and their grammatical complexity level exists in the level of sentence, clause, and word.; As for the EEFTC, it presents the lowest syntactic complexity at all levels throughout the three years. This supports a positive correlation between EEFTC and the other two batteries regarding the designed level and its yearly average grammatical complexity level.
机译：本研究考察了2002年至2004年为选拔台湾高校学生而进行的三种英语能力测试AST，SAT和EEFTC。这项研究提出了四个研究问题。首先，就2002年至2004年AST，SAT和EEFTC的三个分类中的四级语法框架而言，不同语法结构的比例分布和比例重点是什么？其次，在2002年至2004年这三个单元之间以及在四个单元之间的四级语法框架方面，有哪些异同？第三，从2002年到2004年，AST和SAT的年平均语法复杂度水平如何与其设计的难度水平相对应？被认为比SAT更难的AST的语法复杂度的年平均水平是否比SAT在2002年至2004年的水平高？第四，从2002年到2004年，将EEFTC与AST和SAT相比较的年平均语法复杂度水平是多少？{09} EEFTC的语法复杂度水平是否比AST和SAT低？比2002年至2004年的EEFTC难？为了回答这些问题，开发了一个四级语法框架以生成有关四个级别的三个测试电池的语法结构的统计信息。此外，还开发了语法复杂性的层次结构，以比较不同测试之间以及测试之间的相对语法复杂性。研究结果表明，从2002年到2004年，AST在句子从句，名词短语，介词和辅助动词以及单词的层次上，年平均语法复杂性较高。{09}在句子，形容词，副词和主要动词SAT的年平均语法复杂度更高。这表明在子句，名词短语，介词和辅助动词以及单词的级别中，两个测试的难度水平与其语法复杂性水平之间存在正相关。另一方面，两个测试的设计相对难度等级与其语法复杂度等级之间的负相关存在于句子，从句和单词的等级中。至于EEFTC，这是三年来所有级别的语法复杂度最低的一年。这支持了EEFTC与其他两个电池之间在设计水平及其年平均语法复杂性水平方面的正相关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee, Ming-Hua.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas A&M University - Kingsville.;

  • 授予单位 Texas A&M University - Kingsville.;
  • 学科 Education Bilingual and Multicultural.; Education Tests and Measurements.; Language Linguistics.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 160 p.
  • 总页数 160
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;语言学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号