• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Proof of death: An analysis of methods that the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia used to establish death.
【24h】

Proof of death: An analysis of methods that the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia used to establish death.

机译：死亡证明：对前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭用来确定死亡的方法的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia's ("ICTY") jurisdiction encompasses three main categories of crime: war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity. Between 1997 and 2004, the frequency of Trial Chambers' citations to forensic evidence in establishing a victim's death has decreased. This shift in frequency could be a result of an amendment to the ICTY's Rules of Procedure and Evidence to incorporate Rule 92 bis, which allows the Trial Chambers to admit confidential and lay witness written statements to establish a victim's death in order to shorten the trial process.; Since 2001, the ICTY Trial Chambers has changed the types of evidence it cited to establish a victim's death. First, the Trial Chambers dramatically decreased the number of expert witness citations. Second, although the Trial Chambers cited similar number of forensic exhibits in pre-and post-Rule 92 bis judgments, forensic evidence citations decreased forty-four percent in relation to the total number of citations. Third, the Trial Chambers significantly increased their reliance on non-forensic exhibits. Finally, the Trial Chambers cited more confidential 92bis statements and 92bis statements to establish death than forensic exhibits in post-Rule 92bis judgments. This bias attitude toward eyewitness testimony could jeopardize the accuracy and integrity of the trial proceedings.
机译：前南斯拉夫国际刑事法庭（“ ICTY”）管辖权包括三类主要犯罪：战争罪，种族灭绝罪和危害人类罪。在1997年至2004年之间，审判分庭在确定受害者死亡时引用法医证据的频率有所下降。频率上的变化可能是由于对前南问题国际法庭的《程序和证据规则》进行了修正，纳入了第92条之二，该条允许审判分庭承认机密并以证人的书面陈述确定受害者的死亡，以缩短审判程序。 。;自2001年以来，前南问题国际法庭审判分庭改变了它所引用的确定受害者死亡的证据类型。首先，审判分庭大大减少了专家证人的引用次数。其次，尽管审判分庭在第92条之二之前和之后的判决中引用了相似数量的法医证物，但法证证据的引用量相对于引用总数减少了百分之四十四。第三，审判分庭大大增加了对非法证品的依赖。最后，审判分庭引用了规则第92bis条后判决中比法医证词更为机密的92bis声明和92bis声明来确定死亡。这种对目击者证词的偏见态度可能会损害审判程序的准确性和完整性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Beatty, Jennifer L.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Law.; Anthropology Physical.; Sociology Criminology and Penology.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 157 p.
  • 总页数 157
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;人类学;法学各部门;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号