• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Toxic substances and federal water policy: Application of Kingdon's model of agenda change to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1972.
【24h】

Toxic substances and federal water policy: Application of Kingdon's model of agenda change to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1972.

机译：有毒物质和联邦水政策：将Kingdon的议程更改模型应用于1972年的《大湖水质量协议》。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1972 represented very significant change in the federal government's agenda because it provided for water pollution programs and measures for toxic substances discharged into the Great Lakes where none previously existed. The agenda change was most apparent in relation to federal water policies established under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1965 that established a national policy on water pollution for the first time but gave the States primary responsibility for implementing pollution control programs. In particular, the Great Lakes States did not have effective water pollution policies for toxic substances, such as mercury or pesticides.; This research used a structured, focused comparison method to test the applicability of Kingdon's model to the Great Lakes case for toxic substances. Kingdon's "policy process streams" model postulates a set of factors and an agenda change process that determine how problems are perceived important enough for government to do something about them; policy proposals are perceived as viable and worth supporting; and, decisionmakers view support for government action by important constituencies and government institutions. Original archival records, published government documents and the open literature were used to test the model.; The research found that, while Kingdon's model cannot be strictly applied to all aspects of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement case it is useful for understanding how policy issues move up in priority on the governmental agenda. Thus, the essential factors required within each policy process stream; the problems, politics and policies streams generally operated as Kingdon's model indicated they should. The major exception was the operation of the policies stream because participants from other process streams became significantly involved in developing policy proposals. The model posits that the three process streams operate independently. Thus, Kingdon's model, which is predicated on an independence among the participants of the policy process streams during the duration of the agenda change process, could not be successfully applied to any part of the process in this case study.
机译：1972年的《大湖水质量协议》代表了联邦政府议程中的重大变化，因为它为排放到大湖中的有毒物质制定了水污染计划和措施。与根据1965年《联邦水污染控制法》制定的联邦水政策相比，议程变化最为明显，该法案首次制定了国家水污染政策，但赋予了州实施污染控制计划的主要责任。特别是大湖区国家对汞或农药等有毒物质没有有效的水污染政策；这项研究使用一种结构化的，集中的比较方法来测试金顿模型对大湖地区有毒物质的适用性。金登的“政策流程流”模型提出了一系列因素和议程变更流程，这些流程和流程决定了人们如何认为问题足够重要，以使政府能够对问题采取行动。政策建议被认为是可行的，值得支持；并且，决策者认为重要选区和政府机构对政府行动的支持。该模型使用原始档案记录，已发布的政府文件和公开文献进行了测试。研究发现，尽管金顿的模型不能严格地应用于《大湖水质量协议》案的所有方面，但对于理解政策问题如何在政府议程上优先发展是有用的。因此，每个政策流程中需要的基本因素；问题，政治和政策流通常按照金顿的模型表明的那样运作。主要的例外是策略流的操作，因为来自其他流程流的参与者显着参与了制定策略建议。该模型假定三个流程流是独立运行的。因此，金顿的模型基于在议程变更过程中政策过程流参与者之间的独立性，因此无法成功地应用于本案例研究的过程的任何部分。

著录项

  • 作者

    MacDonagh-Dumler, Jon.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 345 p.
  • 总页数 345
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;国际法;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号