首页> 外文学位 >Defining intellectual curiosity in higher education.
【24h】

Defining intellectual curiosity in higher education.

机译:定义高等教育中的知识好奇心。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the past five years, the term intellectual curiosity has been used more often in the fields of research, education, and employment. As college admissions and the job market become more competitive, many universities and employers are stressing the demonstration of intellectual curiosity as a determining factor in admission and hiring decisions. To this date, the term lacks empirical definition. The current study focuses on establishing a sound framework for developing a foundation for exploring the term intellectual curiosity and examines the interrelationships among variables generated by the framework. The rationale for this study is to offer a definition of intellectual curiosity to assist educators with identifying student characteristics that demonstrate the term based on the theoretical perspectives of Cattell (1943, 1957) and Berlyne (1960). This study integrated the theory of curiosity with the investment theory to propose a framework for exploring the factor structure of intellectual curiosity.;Undergraduate students completed three survey instruments measuring curiosity and exploration, the need for cognition, and the big five factors of personality. A factor analytic approach was used to explore the factor structure of intellectual curiosity and align that structure with the speculated conceptual definitions of intellectual curiosity found in the current literature. The factor analysis and conceptual alignment findings were integrated to identify an empirical definition for intellectual curiosity. Current study findings support an empirical definition of intellectual curiosity that encompasses intellectual engagement, seeking new information through exploration, a desire to engage in and understand the world, conscientiousness, and openness to new ideas and experiences. Research implications of these findings include the potential for further theory development and the potential for measures of intellectual curiosity for classroom and research purposes. Implications for practice include the potential for assisting college administrators and employers with research based decisions regarding admissions, recruitment, and hiring processes. The field of education may benefit from the study's findings with the potential for stimulating the intellectual curiosity within faculty, influencing teaching practices, and enriching students' learning. Suggestions for future research are also addressed.
机译:在过去的五年中,“好奇心”一词在研究,教育和就业领域得到了越来越多的使用。随着大学入学和就业市场竞争的加剧,许多大学和雇主都在强调表现出求知欲,这是决定录取和聘用决策的因素。迄今为止,该术语缺乏经验定义。当前的研究侧重于建立一个良好的框架,为探索智力好奇这个术语奠定基础,并研究框架产生的变量之间的相互关系。这项研究的基本目的是提供一个好奇心的定义,以帮助教育工作者识别学生的特征,这些特征基于Cattell(1943,1957)和Berlyne(1960)的理论观点来证明该术语。本研究将好奇心理论与投资理论相结合,为探索智力好奇心的因素结构提供了框架。本科生完成了三种测量好奇心和探索,认知需求以及人格五大因素的调查工具。因子分析方法被用来探索智力好奇心的因子结构,并使该结构与当前文献中推测的智力好奇心的概念定义保持一致。整合因素分析和概念上的一致性发现,以识别出对好奇心的经验定义。当前的研究结果支持了对知识好奇心的经验定义,其中包括知识参与,通过探索寻求新信息,参与和理解世界的愿望,尽责性以及对新思想和经验的开放性。这些发现的研究意义包括进一步理论发展的潜力以及用于课堂和研究目的的知识好奇心测量的潜力。对实践的影响包括有可能协助大学行政人员和雇主做出有关招生,招聘和聘用过程的基于研究的决策。教育领域可能会受益于这项研究的发现,并有可能激发教师的智力好奇心,影响教学实践并丰富学生的学习。还提出了未来研究的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bridier, Nancy Lea.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of West Florida.;

  • 授予单位 The University of West Florida.;
  • 学科 Personality psychology.;Higher education.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 151 p.
  • 总页数 151
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 F7-4;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号