首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of computer-assisted personal interviewing and paper-and-pencil interviewing on responses to open-ended questions.
【24h】

A comparison of computer-assisted personal interviewing and paper-and-pencil interviewing on responses to open-ended questions.

机译:比较了计算机辅助的个人访谈和纸笔访谈对开放式问题的回答。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The personal computer offers several advantages to research organizations relative to other data collection procedures. If computerized data collection procedures ultimately replace paper-and-pencil methods, then systematic investigations of data quality using new methods are warranted. This thesis compares responses to open-ended questions for computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil personal interviewing. A total of 1,972 respondents participated in three split ballot tests. Participants were assigned to either the computer or paper-and-pencil interviewing condition. The total number of thought units given in response to two open-ended questions were compared using T-tests and three-way Analysis of Variance to determine if the total number of thought units varied by mode. Although a significant main effect was found for mode for one test, the effect size was small, suggesting the difference was due to the large sample size. Results indicate the total number of thought units was not dependent upon condition.
机译:与其他数据收集程序相比,个人计算机为研究机构提供了许多优势。如果计算机化的数据收集程序最终取代了纸笔方法,那么就需要使用新方法对数据质量进行系统的调查。本文比较了针对计算机辅助和纸笔个人访谈的开放式问题的回答。共有1,972名受访者参加了三项拆分投票测试。参与者被分配到计算机或纸笔面试条件。使用T检验和三方差分析比较了针对两个开放性问题给出的思维单元总数,以确定思维单元的总数是否随模式而变化。尽管在一项测试中发现了显着的主效应,但效应量很小,这表明差异是由于样本量较大所致。结果表明,思维单元的总数与条件无关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Berkowitz, Judith Miriam.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Speech Communication.;Statistics.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 41 p.
  • 总页数 41
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;统计学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号