• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Legal scholars and inquiry paradigms: Understanding the influences upon paradigmatic assumptions and their impacts.
【24h】

Legal scholars and inquiry paradigms: Understanding the influences upon paradigmatic assumptions and their impacts.

机译：法律学者和探究范式：了解对范式假设的影响及其影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Legal scholars exhibit increasingly divergent intellectual and institutional climates because new inquiry paradigms have evolved within their discipline. In order to explore the influence and impact of the diversity of paradigmatic assumptions upon individual legal scholars, I constructed a literature-based typology that divided them into three paradigms--realist, critical, and interpretive--based upon their different core ontological, epistemological, and methodological assumptions. Using interpretive methods, I interviewed 22 legal scholars representing each of these paradigms, three different institutions, and various demographic characteristics.;These legal scholars purported to make a conscious decision to adopt one or another of these very basic sets of views, although paradigm choice seems to be a much different process for scholars who remain within a certain paradigmatic tradition and those who adopt an alternative set of assumptions. Paradigm choice appeared to be particularly influenced by personal experiences, such as exposure to certain persuasive scholarly works or experience in law practice. Demographic and identity-based variables--gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, generation, etc.--were especially influential. Paradigm choices seemed to have the greatest impact upon legal scholars' professional lives when they took individuals outside of the mainstream of the discipline, as with scholars working with critical theory or economic models. These effects appeared to be more pronounced for older alternative paradigm scholars than for younger scholars working with critical and interpretive models.;The product of my work is a model that others might use to explore these issues of consciousness of choice, the factors that underlie paradigm choice, and the personal and professional impacts of these choices. I suggest sets of potential influences and possible impacts that other scholars might test and refine, either as they might apply to law or other disciplines, particularly those in the social sciences. I also offer a model of the potential interaction of paradigm culture with the cultures unique to disciplines and institutions and the possible impacts that these cultures jointly have upon scholars' professional careers.
机译：由于新的研究范式在其学科范围内不断发展，法律学者展现出越来越不同的知识分子和制度氛围。为了探讨范式假设的多样性对个别法律学者的影响和影响，我构建了一种基于文学的类型学，根据其不同的核心本体论，认识论将它们分为现实主义，批判性和解释性三个范式。 ，以及方法上的假设。我使用解释性方法采访了代表这些范式，三个不同机构和不同人口统计学特征的22名法律学者;这些法律学者旨在做出有意识的决定，以采纳这些非常基本的观点中的一种或另一种观点，尽管选择了范式。对于留在某种范式传统中的学者和采用另一组假设的学者来说，这似乎是一个截然不同的过程。范式的选择似乎特别受个人经验的影响，例如接触某些有说服力的学术著作或法律实践经验。人口和基于身份的变量-性别，种族，种族，性取向，世代等-尤其具有影响力。范式的选择似乎对法律学者的职业生涯产生了最大的影响，因为他们将个人带离该学科的主流之外，就像研究批判理论或经济学模型的学者一样。与使用批判和解释模型的年轻学者相比，这些观点对于年长的替代范式学者而言似乎更为明显。；我的工作成果是一个模型，其他人可以用来探索这些选择意识的问题，这些问题是范式的基础选择，以及这些选择对个人和专业的影响。我建议其他学者可能测试和完善的一系列潜在影响和可能影响，因为它们可能适用于法律或其他学科，尤其是社会科学领域的学科。我还提供了范式文化与学科和机构特有的文化之间潜在相互作用的模型，以及这些文化共同对学者的职业生涯可能产生的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Toma, John Douglas.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Education Social Sciences.;Law.;Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 232 p.
  • 总页数 232
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号