首页> 外文学位 >Academic due process and substantive due process in higher education administrations censured by the American Association of University Professors during 1980-1983.
【24h】

Academic due process and substantive due process in higher education administrations censured by the American Association of University Professors during 1980-1983.

机译:高等教育行政管理中的学术正当程序和实质性正当程序在1980-1983年期间受到美国大学教授协会的谴责。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined the twelve publicly reported cases in which the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) censured higher education administrations during 1980-1983. The study analyzed compliance of administrations, governing boards, and courts with AAUP principles regarding academic freedom and tenure. This study also investigated reactions of these administrations and boards to AAUP recommendations concerning academic freedom and tenure.;Study research was conducted at AAUP headquarters in Washington, D.C. This research involved determining the number, positions, and levels of involvement of university officials in cases concerning academic freedom and tenure. The research also examined procedures used to censure administrations for violations.;Although various faculty handbooks state that tenured faculty members can expect employment for as long as funding exists (barring dismissal for cause), the study found that shifts in student enrollment or institution priorities can jeopardize tenured faculty jobs. The study also noted that courts have decided that nontenured faculty who waive their rights to tenure waived their rights of entitlement to a hearing. Several professors found that their classrooms were subject to administrative intrusions. The courts have decided that administrations may object to and correct faculty actions and teaching techniques deemed inappropriate.;The study concluded that during 1980-1983, administrations hired and fired faculty members at will, as merely contractual employees.
机译:这项研究调查了美国大学教授协会(AAUP)在1980-1983年间谴责高等教育管理部门的十二个公开报道的案例。该研究分析了政府,理事会和法院对AAUP关于学术自由和任期的原则的遵守情况。这项研究还调查了这些主管部门和董事会对AAUP关于学术自由和终身制的建议的反应。研究在AAUP华盛顿特区总部进行。这项研究涉及确定大学官员在涉及以下案件的数量,职位和参与程度学术自由和任期。该研究还研究了用于谴责行政管理部门违规行为的程序。尽管各种教科书规定,只要有资金存在,终身教职人员就可以期待就业(禁止因故解雇),但该研究发现,学生入学率的变化或机构优先级可以危及终身教职。该研究还指出,法院已裁定,放弃终身任用权的非终身任职教师放弃了其听证会的权利。几位教授发现他们的教室受到行政干预。法院已裁定,主管部门可以反对并纠正被认为不适当的教职员工行为和教学技巧。研究得出结论,在1980-1983年间,主管部门随意雇用和解雇了教职员工,只是合同工。

著录项

  • 作者

    Khidhr, Latifah Adjua.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Education Administration.;Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 207 p.
  • 总页数 207
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号